Skip to main content

Fuel levy won’t replace Gauteng e-tolls

Despite support from the Justice Project South Africa (JPSA) and the Opposition to Urban Tolling Alliance (OUTA), Gauteng’s e-tolls will not be replaced with a fuel levy after the country’s other eight provinces overwhelmingly rejected this idea, saying they will not be made to pay for excellent roads when theirs are poorly maintained. The provinces also rejected a proposal that the national government should take over the funding of improvements to Gauteng highways. Instead of the current user-pay p
September 23, 2014 Read time: 2 mins
Despite support from the Justice Project South Africa (JPSA) and the Opposition to Urban Tolling Alliance  (OUTA), Gauteng’s e-tolls will not be replaced with a fuel levy after the country’s other eight provinces overwhelmingly rejected this idea, saying they will not be made to pay for excellent roads when theirs are poorly maintained.

The provinces also rejected a proposal that the national government should take over the funding of improvements to Gauteng highways.

Instead of the current user-pay principle, the proposal calls for the money that the Treasury ring-fences for the improvement of all national roads to be used to help settle the massive US$1.8 billion debt incurred as a result of the upgrading of Gauteng’s highways.

“We cannot be funders of the beautiful roads in Gauteng when our roads are in a poor state,” Free State transport MEC Butana Komphela said.

JPSA’s Howard Dembovsky says there are other ways to pay for the roads and declares: “We have made a number of recommendations and of course we cannot ignore the elephant in the room which is the fuel levy. We have provided sustentative proof that there is no such thing as not being able to ring-fence the fuel levy.”

Civil body OUTA wants an increase of nine cents in the fuel levy considered as an alternative to e-tolling.  A panel which is made up of industry experts is hearing public submissions into the feasibility of the controversial Gauteng tolling system.

OUTA spokesman Wayne Duvenage says the tolls US$135 million behind after nine months of operations and it is getting worse every day. “We have advocated that if you add nine cents to the fuel levy, you will raise the US$171 million that you need every year to pay back the bonds and interest and the administration cost is zero.”

Related Content

  • Canadian authorities convinced of enforcement safety benefits
    November 28, 2012
    Cost-benefit analysis invariably finds highly in favour of speed and red light enforcement, particularly so in Edmonton in the Alberta province of Canada, where authorities need no convincing of the merits of road safety engineering. Justification of enforcement efforts on economic grounds has been reinforced this year, by a study of the costs and benefits of red light enforcement. New York-based economic research firm John Dunham & Associates carried out this latest analysis for American Traffic Solutions
  • Arup picks 8 ways ITS can save the planet
    January 6, 2022
    The solutions we need to accelerate carbon-free transport are known, available and ready to be deployed. Tim Gammons from Arup explains what the ITS industry can do now to help…
  • London needs just one road user charge, says report
    July 8, 2019
    London’s patchwork of road charging schemes should be replaced by a single, distance-based user charge, according to new research. Apart from anything else, it would be much fairer… The UK capital’s multiple road charging schemes require a radical overhaul, according to a new report by the Centre for London thinktank. The suggested solution is to replace existing levies on drivers with a single, distance-based user charge which would more fairly reflect how much, and at what time, people are using London
  • Independence and mobility key for older drivers, IAM report finds
    February 18, 2016
    The majority of older drivers want to continue driving as long as they are safely able, according to a survey commissioned by the Institute of Advanced Motorists (IAM), citing independence and convenience as the main reasons. The report, Keeping Older Drivers Safe and Mobile, surveyed more than 2,600 drivers and ex-drivers between the ages of 55 and 101 and was written by Dr Carol Hawley from the University of Warwick Medical School. Although the report found 84 per cent of driver respondents rated th