Skip to main content

Fuel levy won’t replace Gauteng e-tolls

Despite support from the Justice Project South Africa (JPSA) and the Opposition to Urban Tolling Alliance (OUTA), Gauteng’s e-tolls will not be replaced with a fuel levy after the country’s other eight provinces overwhelmingly rejected this idea, saying they will not be made to pay for excellent roads when theirs are poorly maintained. The provinces also rejected a proposal that the national government should take over the funding of improvements to Gauteng highways. Instead of the current user-pay p
September 23, 2014 Read time: 2 mins
Despite support from the Justice Project South Africa (JPSA) and the Opposition to Urban Tolling Alliance  (OUTA), Gauteng’s e-tolls will not be replaced with a fuel levy after the country’s other eight provinces overwhelmingly rejected this idea, saying they will not be made to pay for excellent roads when theirs are poorly maintained.

The provinces also rejected a proposal that the national government should take over the funding of improvements to Gauteng highways.

Instead of the current user-pay principle, the proposal calls for the money that the Treasury ring-fences for the improvement of all national roads to be used to help settle the massive US$1.8 billion debt incurred as a result of the upgrading of Gauteng’s highways.

“We cannot be funders of the beautiful roads in Gauteng when our roads are in a poor state,” Free State transport MEC Butana Komphela said.

JPSA’s Howard Dembovsky says there are other ways to pay for the roads and declares: “We have made a number of recommendations and of course we cannot ignore the elephant in the room which is the fuel levy. We have provided sustentative proof that there is no such thing as not being able to ring-fence the fuel levy.”

Civil body OUTA wants an increase of nine cents in the fuel levy considered as an alternative to e-tolling.  A panel which is made up of industry experts is hearing public submissions into the feasibility of the controversial Gauteng tolling system.

OUTA spokesman Wayne Duvenage says the tolls US$135 million behind after nine months of operations and it is getting worse every day. “We have advocated that if you add nine cents to the fuel levy, you will raise the US$171 million that you need every year to pay back the bonds and interest and the administration cost is zero.”

Related Content

  • Asecap prepares for ‘interoperability on steroids’
    March 31, 2023
    The gathering of Europe’s toll professionals offers a chance for views to be exchanged by senior people on a number of big issues: and there’s currently an awful lot to think about, reports Geoff Hadwick
  • New analysis finds speed cameras may create bad driving behaviour
    October 28, 2015
    Using more than one billion miles of driving behaviour data, collected over three years (2011-2014) and including 8,809 separate journeys in 5,353 vehicles, Wunelli, a LexisNexis company, has revealed the most frequent braking black spots across the UK created by speed cameras, based on motorists braking excessively just before speed cameras to avoid being caught. Eighty per cent of all the UK speed cameras investigated had hard braking activity, with braking increasing six fold on average at these loca
  • Sweden winning over doubters
    December 4, 2012
    Comparatively little negative comment has been made in Swedish media with regard to the country’s widespread speed enforcement, according to project manager Eva Lundberg of Trafikverket, Sweden’s Transport dministration. Lundberg is due to give a presentation at the Vienna World Congress special session on enforcement, probably with more than a passing word on public acceptance. Trafikverket has put a lot of work into its Vision Zero road safety strategy over the past few years; much of it targeting reducti
  • IAM dismayed at political parties for not tackling road death initiatives
    April 24, 2015
    The Institute of Advanced Motorists (IAM) has reacted with dismay at the lack of priority given to cutting deaths on UK roads by the main political parties in their election manifestos. Despite road accidents being the leading cause of death for males and females between five and 19, and the third leading cause of death for both males and females aged 20-34 in England and Wales, no party has published any long or short-term initiatives to tackle such a significant cause of death amongst young people.