Skip to main content

Fuel levy won’t replace Gauteng e-tolls

Despite support from the Justice Project South Africa (JPSA) and the Opposition to Urban Tolling Alliance (OUTA), Gauteng’s e-tolls will not be replaced with a fuel levy after the country’s other eight provinces overwhelmingly rejected this idea, saying they will not be made to pay for excellent roads when theirs are poorly maintained. The provinces also rejected a proposal that the national government should take over the funding of improvements to Gauteng highways. Instead of the current user-pay p
September 23, 2014 Read time: 2 mins
Despite support from the Justice Project South Africa (JPSA) and the Opposition to Urban Tolling Alliance  (OUTA), Gauteng’s e-tolls will not be replaced with a fuel levy after the country’s other eight provinces overwhelmingly rejected this idea, saying they will not be made to pay for excellent roads when theirs are poorly maintained.

The provinces also rejected a proposal that the national government should take over the funding of improvements to Gauteng highways.

Instead of the current user-pay principle, the proposal calls for the money that the Treasury ring-fences for the improvement of all national roads to be used to help settle the massive US$1.8 billion debt incurred as a result of the upgrading of Gauteng’s highways.

“We cannot be funders of the beautiful roads in Gauteng when our roads are in a poor state,” Free State transport MEC Butana Komphela said.

JPSA’s Howard Dembovsky says there are other ways to pay for the roads and declares: “We have made a number of recommendations and of course we cannot ignore the elephant in the room which is the fuel levy. We have provided sustentative proof that there is no such thing as not being able to ring-fence the fuel levy.”

Civil body OUTA wants an increase of nine cents in the fuel levy considered as an alternative to e-tolling.  A panel which is made up of industry experts is hearing public submissions into the feasibility of the controversial Gauteng tolling system.

OUTA spokesman Wayne Duvenage says the tolls US$135 million behind after nine months of operations and it is getting worse every day. “We have advocated that if you add nine cents to the fuel levy, you will raise the US$171 million that you need every year to pay back the bonds and interest and the administration cost is zero.”

Related Content

  • Smartphone - the next technology for charging and tolling?
    January 25, 2012
    With all the debates over the most suitable future technology or technologies for charging and tolling, is it not time for the industry to look at what the rest of ITS is doing and bring a rank outsider - the smart phone - closer into the fold? By Jack Opiola, D'Artagnan Consulting LLC
  • Amsterdam reaps the reward of digitised parking
    April 20, 2016
    Amsterdam had taken the final step in digitising parking and parking enforcement and the move is paying dividends. It was almost a decade ago that the City of Amsterdam decided to start the evolution - or maybe even a revolution – of its parking enforcement: it got rid of the paper parking permit or ticket behind the windscreen and introduced the digital parking right. It was the first step on a bumpy but successful road to digitization, resulting in a fore running position in on street parking enforcement.
  • Counting the environmental costs of ITS deployment
    October 29, 2015
    David Crawford looks at the latest thinking about calculating the benefits associated with the environmental side of ITS schemes. The penny is dropping that some environmental costs “are being shifted outside the traditional bounds of evaluation methods” for ITS-based road transport projects, according to researchers at the UK University of Leeds’ Institute for Transport Studies.
  • Just Zip it! Lindsay takes to the road
    October 10, 2018
    Greater vehicle connectivity is going to have huge implications for traffic management. David Arminas climbed aboard a Lindsay Road Zipper to see what this might mean in future As vice president of barrier specialist QMB Canada, Marc-Andre Seguin is sanguine about the future for moveable barriers. On the one hand, it looks good. The oft-stated advantage of moveable barriers is that the systems are cheaper to install than adding a lane or two to a highway or bridge. Directional changes to lanes can boost