Skip to main content

Florida ‘should consider mileage tax’

The concept of road users in Florida paying a mileage tax can no longer be considered a far fetched one. The statewide transportation advisory group Florida Metropolitan Planning Organisation Advisory Council (MPO) has asked the state legislature to start considering a system that requires individuals to pay for each mile driven. An earlier two-year MPO study to find a way to pay for the state’s future transportation needs found that, for the long-term, the state could no longer rely on a fuel tax, which c
April 22, 2013 Read time: 2 mins
The concept of road users in Florida paying a mileage tax can no longer be considered a far fetched one.  The statewide transportation advisory group Florida Metropolitan Planning Organisation Advisory Council (MPO) has asked the state legislature to start considering a system that requires individuals to pay for each mile driven.

An earlier two-year MPO study to find a way to pay for the state’s future transportation needs found that, for the long-term, the state could no longer rely on a fuel tax, which currently pays for transportation projects in Florida, such as maintaining roads and subsidising public transportation.

The influx of high-mileage cars has meant a decline in the tax revenue received via the tax and there is an estimated US$74 billion shortfall to pay for needed transportation projects.  The Florida MPO says the state should be seriously considering mileage-based user fees. If implemented, the fuel tax could be eliminated completely.

"In the next ten years, they will eventually do it," said Lauderhill Mayor Richard Kaplan, Florida MPO board chairman. "Otherwise, we won't be able to maintain our roads or transportation system. This is going to happen."

While Florida is clearly heading that direction, the advent of express toll lanes in the south of the state, as well as all-electronic tolling on Florida turnpikes are seen as stepping stones for the mileage-based system, according to Robert Poole, director of transportation at the Reason Foundation, a public policy think tank. "It's a good start," he said. "It's a way to pay for widening projects. It gets SunPass in more vehicles. And it's getting people used to the idea."

Related Content

  • To charge or not to charge, that is the question
    January 26, 2018
    Alan Dron looks at why congestion charging and other similar schemes are so controversial in North America. In August, Andrew Cuomo, governor of New York State, described congestion charging for the city as “an idea whose time had come,” according to the Bloomberg wire service. In October, he announced a ‘Fix NYC’ advisory panel to study methods of easing congestion on the city’s streets. Although Cuomo did not specifically mention congestion charging when setting up the panel, he said it would study
  • CBI calls for new approach to road funding
    October 11, 2012
    The Confederation of British Industry (CBI) calls for road charging should be introduced on the strategic road network in England. Proposals in the report, Bold Thinking: A model to fund our future roads also suggest that responsibility for the network’s budget should be taken away from the Department for Transport (DfT) and given to an independent regulator. Launching the report, CBI director-general John Cridland said a regulatory asset base (RAB) model was required to address the problem of long-term fu
  • America fires V2V starting gun
    April 7, 2014
    Leo McCloskey, ITS America’s senior vice president for Technical Programs, talks to Jason Barnes about what the recent NHTSA ruling on light vehicle connectivity means for cooperative infrastructures in North America. In early February the US Department of Transportation’s (USDOT’s) National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) announced it had decided to start taking steps to enable Vehicle-to-Vehicle (V2V) communication technology for light vehicles. In so doing, the many safety-related applicati
  • Will interoperability prevent progress?
    January 10, 2014
    David Crawford examines the political and industrial background to the tolling technology debate. Saving the US State of California ‘millions of dollars’ in tolling infrastructure costs by encouraging new technologies is the professed aim of a legislative Bill, SB 242, which is currently moving through the State’s Senate (upper house) process. According to its sponsor, Republican State Senator Mark Wyland, permitting alternatives to the current FasTrak-branded radio-frequency identification (RFID)-based sys