Skip to main content

Florida ‘should consider mileage tax’

The concept of road users in Florida paying a mileage tax can no longer be considered a far fetched one. The statewide transportation advisory group Florida Metropolitan Planning Organisation Advisory Council (MPO) has asked the state legislature to start considering a system that requires individuals to pay for each mile driven. An earlier two-year MPO study to find a way to pay for the state’s future transportation needs found that, for the long-term, the state could no longer rely on a fuel tax, which c
April 22, 2013 Read time: 2 mins
The concept of road users in Florida paying a mileage tax can no longer be considered a far fetched one.  The statewide transportation advisory group Florida Metropolitan Planning Organisation Advisory Council (MPO) has asked the state legislature to start considering a system that requires individuals to pay for each mile driven.

An earlier two-year MPO study to find a way to pay for the state’s future transportation needs found that, for the long-term, the state could no longer rely on a fuel tax, which currently pays for transportation projects in Florida, such as maintaining roads and subsidising public transportation.

The influx of high-mileage cars has meant a decline in the tax revenue received via the tax and there is an estimated US$74 billion shortfall to pay for needed transportation projects.  The Florida MPO says the state should be seriously considering mileage-based user fees. If implemented, the fuel tax could be eliminated completely.

"In the next ten years, they will eventually do it," said Lauderhill Mayor Richard Kaplan, Florida MPO board chairman. "Otherwise, we won't be able to maintain our roads or transportation system. This is going to happen."

While Florida is clearly heading that direction, the advent of express toll lanes in the south of the state, as well as all-electronic tolling on Florida turnpikes are seen as stepping stones for the mileage-based system, according to Robert Poole, director of transportation at the Reason Foundation, a public policy think tank. "It's a good start," he said. "It's a way to pay for widening projects. It gets SunPass in more vehicles. And it's getting people used to the idea."

Related Content

  • New US fuel efficiency standards would cost over US$65 billion in lost revenue
    April 17, 2012
    Friday’s proposal by the Obama Administration to increase fuel efficiency standards for cars and light trucks to an average 54.5 miles per gallon (4.32 litres/100 km) between 2017 and 2025 would result in the loss of more than $65 billion in federal funding for state and local highway, bridge and transit improvements, an analysis by the American Road & Transportation Builders Association (ARTBA) shows.
  • Governments must look beyond short-term spending of public funds
    February 2, 2012
    Phil Pettitt, Chief Executive of innovITS, the UK's ITS Centre of Excellence, argues that governments need to look beyond the short-term when looking to pump-prime economic recovery with public funds. It seems, in the current economic climate, that a 'good' day is one in which no company is announcing job cuts or going into administration. Consumer demand is down and businesses are retrenching, cutting costs and fretting over the consequences of shrinking opportunities and order books. It has not been this
  • Major setback for California bullet train
    August 27, 2013
    The California High-Speed Rail project, which aims to connect the mega-regions of the state, contribute to economic development and a cleaner environment, create jobs and preserve agricultural and protected lands, was dealt a serious blow when Judge Michael Kenny of the Sacramento Superior Court ruled that the California High-Speed Rail Authority "abused its discretion by approving a funding plan that did not comply with the requirements of the law."
  • ITS America maps out implications and opportunities for ITS industry
    November 28, 2012
    A critical milestone was reached in July 2012, when the US Congress passed, and President Obama signed, legislation reauthorising the nation's surface transportation programs, breaking a nearly three-year log-jam which had blocked critical transportation reforms and delayed much-needed infrastructure projects. In a town where compromise is sometimes considered an endangered species, Republicans and Democrats came together during a months-long series of negotiations and hashed out a bipartisan agreement that