Skip to main content

Bi-State board votes to restart tolling services procurement

The Kentucky-Indiana Joint Board for the Ohio River Bridges Project has voted to restart the procurement of a tolling services provider. The vote comes after the Indiana Finance Authority’s review of a protest submitted by a non-winning bidder in late September. The Joint Board heard from the IFA that the allegations made in the protest were unsubstantiated, but the agency did uncover a significant potential personal and organisational conflict of interest regarding financial arrangements between a subc
October 28, 2014 Read time: 3 mins
The Kentucky-Indiana Joint Board for the Ohio River Bridges Project has voted to restart the procurement of a tolling services provider. The vote comes after the Indiana Finance Authority’s review of a protest submitted by a non-winning bidder in late September.

The Joint Board heard from the IFA that the allegations made in the protest were unsubstantiated, but the agency did uncover a significant potential personal and organisational conflict of interest regarding financial arrangements between a subcontractor of the preferred proposer and a subcontractor of the Joint Board’s toll advisor. The conflict of interest and the appearance of impropriety it creates were substantial enough that the joint board voted to terminate and restart the procurement.

“The best ethical and objective path forward is to cancel the existing procurement and reset the process,” said Kendra York, director of the IFA. “While there was no evidence that the conflict of interest actually influenced the procurement decision, we owe it to the people of Indiana and Kentucky to safeguard their confidence in the process.”

York said prior proposing parties will be allowed to participate in the restart process “without disqualification or prejudice” as a result of the procurement cancellation.

“We have been committed to transparency throughout this project, and that includes our procurement processes,” said Kentucky Transportation Secretary Mike Hancock. “The issue at hand is a conflict of interest, which has now been removed. The restart of the toll system provider procurement can now begin, and we will keep the project on schedule.”

The potential conflict of interest existed between ClearStrategyConsulting, subcontractor to Computer Aid (CAI), the tolling advisor hired by the Joint Board, and Gude Management Group, a subcontractor on the 4984 Kapsch TrafficCom proposal.

The Joint Board will remove CAI as its toll advisor and appoint Parsons Transportation Group as the new interim toll advisor. CAI will serve out an amended contract, which is limited to transitioning the advising role to 4089 Parsons and completing certain tasks unrelated to the procurement. The 6198 Kentucky Transportation Cabinet will establish a new procurement to secure a new, long-term toll advisor.

The IFA requires full disclosure of known conflicts of interest. Board officials do not believe that Kapsch knew of the conflict of interest between its subcontractor and CAI’s subcontractor.

Board officials also believe the restart will not affect the anticipated start date for tolling.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Monitoring and transparency preserve enforcement's reputation
    July 30, 2012
    What can be done to preserve automated enforcement's reputation in the face of media and public criticism? Here, system manufacturers and suppliers talk about what they think are the most appropriate business models. Recent events in Italy only served to once again to push automated enforcement into the media spotlight. At the heart of the matter were the numerous alleged instances of local authorities and their contract suppliers of enforcement services colluding to illegally shorten amber signal phase tim
  • AtkinsRéalis reorganises tolling operation
    April 10, 2024
    Robert Horr replaces New Jersey DoT commissioner Fran O'Connor as national tolls director
  • Pricing practise for HOT lane operation
    May 11, 2017
    Timothy Compston weighs up the critical elements that keep the wheels of dynamic pricing schemes turning in today's high-occupancy toll (HOT) lanes. In the drive towards smarter tolling it is perhaps not surprising that sophisticated pricing algorithms are being rolled out to better reflect supply and demand on the roadway. This is the case with high-occupancy toll (HOT) lanes which a growing number of DoTs are seeing as a way of smoothing the operation of their existing, and planned, freeway infrastructure
  • C-ITS in Europe: It’s the governance, stupid!
    March 3, 2023
    Cooperative ITS (C-ITS) is coming – in fact, it’s already here. But who has responsibility for making it work? Richard Lax of Kapsch TrafficCom thinks there are lessons to be learned from the European experience