Skip to main content

Bi-State board votes to restart tolling services procurement

The Kentucky-Indiana Joint Board for the Ohio River Bridges Project has voted to restart the procurement of a tolling services provider. The vote comes after the Indiana Finance Authority’s review of a protest submitted by a non-winning bidder in late September. The Joint Board heard from the IFA that the allegations made in the protest were unsubstantiated, but the agency did uncover a significant potential personal and organisational conflict of interest regarding financial arrangements between a subc
October 28, 2014 Read time: 3 mins
The Kentucky-Indiana Joint Board for the Ohio River Bridges Project has voted to restart the procurement of a tolling services provider. The vote comes after the Indiana Finance Authority’s review of a protest submitted by a non-winning bidder in late September.

The Joint Board heard from the IFA that the allegations made in the protest were unsubstantiated, but the agency did uncover a significant potential personal and organisational conflict of interest regarding financial arrangements between a subcontractor of the preferred proposer and a subcontractor of the Joint Board’s toll advisor. The conflict of interest and the appearance of impropriety it creates were substantial enough that the joint board voted to terminate and restart the procurement.

“The best ethical and objective path forward is to cancel the existing procurement and reset the process,” said Kendra York, director of the IFA. “While there was no evidence that the conflict of interest actually influenced the procurement decision, we owe it to the people of Indiana and Kentucky to safeguard their confidence in the process.”

York said prior proposing parties will be allowed to participate in the restart process “without disqualification or prejudice” as a result of the procurement cancellation.

“We have been committed to transparency throughout this project, and that includes our procurement processes,” said Kentucky Transportation Secretary Mike Hancock. “The issue at hand is a conflict of interest, which has now been removed. The restart of the toll system provider procurement can now begin, and we will keep the project on schedule.”

The potential conflict of interest existed between ClearStrategyConsulting, subcontractor to Computer Aid (CAI), the tolling advisor hired by the Joint Board, and Gude Management Group, a subcontractor on the 4984 Kapsch TrafficCom proposal.

The Joint Board will remove CAI as its toll advisor and appoint Parsons Transportation Group as the new interim toll advisor. CAI will serve out an amended contract, which is limited to transitioning the advising role to 4089 Parsons and completing certain tasks unrelated to the procurement. The 6198 Kentucky Transportation Cabinet will establish a new procurement to secure a new, long-term toll advisor.

The IFA requires full disclosure of known conflicts of interest. Board officials do not believe that Kapsch knew of the conflict of interest between its subcontractor and CAI’s subcontractor.

Board officials also believe the restart will not affect the anticipated start date for tolling.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Kapsch and JSC NIS to bid for Russia’s heavy vehicle tolling system
    November 14, 2013
    A consortium of Kapsch TrafficCom Russia, Kapsch TrafficCom and Russian company JSC (NIS) have successfully pre-qualified and are now set to work on the next stage of the tender for the development of Russia’s nationwide tolling system for heavy vehicles. The system, based on the use of the GLONASS/GPS satellite signal, will target vehicles with a maximum authorised weight of more than 12 tonnes. The project duration is thirteen years. The consortium unites Kapsch and NIS in a joint venture that has a
  • Kapsch looks to the future
    December 16, 2014
    Colin Sowman reports from a two-day meeting where industry leaders, academics and political advisers presented their thoughts on the future of mobility. Most governments do not dare to introduce tolling systems… they are too frightened.” So said Georg Kapsch in his capacity of chief operating officer of Kapsch TrafficCom, during a forward-looking press event at the company’s headquarters in Vienna.
  • Cost benefit goes under the microscope
    August 21, 2017
    Conventional cost benefit analysis (CBA) of plans for urban smart mobility initiatives needs serious rethinking, according to a recently-completed European study. The three-year Evidence Project (the Project) emerged in response to concerns about the availability and quality of documented research – including CBA – required to prove that investment in sustainable urban mobility plans (SUMPs) can be economically beneficial. Covering 22 sectors ranging from electric vehicles to shared spaces, the Project clai
  • Gothenburg to implement congestion charging
    February 2, 2012
    Gothenburg, which is line to become Sweden's second major city to implement congestion charging, will not enjoy the pre-deployment trials and referendum which Stockholm did. But, says the STA's Eva Söderberg, this is less of an issue than might be imagined