Skip to main content

Australia’s congestion may force use of road user pricing

Speaking at the company’s annual general meeting this week, chief executive of toll road operator Transurban, Scott Charlton, claimed that there will come a time when Australia’s roads can no longer be widened to alleviate increasing congestion. He told shareholders that policy reform around infrastructure will be an increasing focus of stakeholders to ensure the most efficient and fair use of transport networks. “As we have said before, it is clear that we cannot simply keep building out the network
October 10, 2014 Read time: 2 mins
Speaking at the company’s annual general meeting this week, chief executive of toll road operator 600 Transurban, Scott Charlton, claimed that there will come a time when Australia’s roads can no longer be widened to alleviate increasing congestion.

He told shareholders that policy reform around infrastructure will be an increasing focus of stakeholders to ensure the most efficient and fair use of transport networks.

“As we have said before, it is clear that we cannot simply keep building out the networks and adding capacity to address declining service levels for the peak periods,” he said. “In the long term, network pricing will have a place in transport policy to manage demand, promote public transport and fund upgrades of infrastructure.”

Various road pricing schemes have been introduced overseas, in cities including London, Stockholm, Singapore and Milan to reduce congestion and emissions.

Dynamic pricing is in operation in a number of locations in the US, including Transurban’s Express Lanes on the I-495 toll road in Virginia. Express Lanes are also operating in Minnesota, Florida and California.

Charlton said Australia’s cities share parallels with these urban centres, with forecast congestion so severe it will require a different way of thinking about how we price to manage demand, change user patterns and, importantly, improve service levels.

He pointed out that both the Productivity Commission and a Federal Government-initiated review on competition policy have listed user-pays pricing as a top priority. Expert opinion from both Government-affiliated and private sector organisations support a critical examination of road pricing. These organisations acknowledge that the funding and operation of the transport systems are reaching breaking point and need to be reformed.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Standardise global ITS protocols to enable interoperability
    January 26, 2012
    ITS America has a new chief technology officer. ITS International caught up with Nu Rosenbohm at this year's World Congress to gather his thoughts on the main challenges at home and abroad
  • ATFI disputes toll survey findings
    September 15, 2014
    According to a recent poll by infrastructure group HNTB, 79 per cent of US residents would support "would support the addition of a toll on a non-tolled surface transportation facility if it resulted in a safer, congestion-free and more reliable trip." The poll also found 83 per cent of its respondents would also support tolls on highways that are currently free, which has been a source of contentious debate in Washington. HNTB Toll Services Chairman Jim Ely said the finding bolstered the argument o
  • Kapsch wins Texas tolling projects
    July 31, 2012
    Kapsch TrafficCom IVHS, a subsidiary of Kapsch TrafficCom, has been selected to design, build, and integrate the managed lane system (MLS) for both the North Tarrant Express (NTE) and LBJ Express projects in Dallas and Tarrant Counties in North Texas.
  • Cost benefit analysis ‘can’t be carried out with a cookbook’
    June 25, 2018
    There is far more to working out the worth of a project than simply filling in a few headings on a spreadsheet. David Crawford surveys some recent thinking from the US and Canada. Cost benefit analysis (CBA) “can’t be carried out with a cookbook”, warns US analyst Professor Robert J Brent. “ You can’t just get out a spreadsheet and fill in the data for all the headings. Each transport CBA should have something that is distinctive, in terms of location (for example, for a rural area), types of user