Skip to main content

Australians ‘open to a fairer, more sustainable road funding system’

Australia’s first real-world trial of road charging options has found that motorists are open to a different way of paying for the nation’s roads. Transurban chief executive officer Scott Charlton said the first stage of the Melbourne Road Usage Study suggested a user-pays system could work in Australia, providing fair, sustainable and flexible funding for the infrastructure. The 18-month study, led by Transurban and supported by independent research and technology specialists, looked at how people used
September 12, 2016 Read time: 2 mins
Australia’s first real-world trial of road charging options has found that motorists are open to a different way of paying for the nation’s roads. 600 Transurban chief executive officer Scott Charlton said the first stage of the Melbourne Road Usage Study suggested a user-pays system could work in Australia, providing fair, sustainable and flexible funding for the infrastructure.

The 18-month study, led by Transurban and supported by independent research and technology specialists, looked at how people used their cars on Melbourne’s road network under different charging options. The trial involved a representative sample of Melbourne car owners installing a small GPS device in their vehicles and providing important insights at regular intervals throughout the study period. More than 1,600 drivers drove 12 million kilometres under a range of charging options, including charge per kilometre, charge per trip and a flat rate. A second trial is currently under way, testing participants’ response to cordon and time of day congestion-based charging options.

Changing the way Australia pays for its roads has been talked about for more than a decade and is a challenge many other countries are confronting. The growing popularity of fuel-efficient cars and the arrival of affordable electric vehicles mean that fuel excise, Australia’s main source of road funding, is forecast to diminish. According to CSIRO modelling, Australia may be looking at a reduction of up to 45 per cent in the revenue it needs to build and maintain its roads by 2050.

Related Content

  • January 30, 2012
    Mounting benefits of dynamic tolling project
    Wisconsin's four-year HOT lanes pilot project, launched in May 2008, cost US$18.8 million to construct. Halfway into the project, which uses variably priced, or dynamic, tolling to improve highway efficiency, the benefits are mounting. The problem was obvious, and frustrating, to anyone who ever sat in bumper-to-bumper traffic on State Route 167 and watched a lone car whiz by every 20 seconds or so in the carpool lane. But for planners at the Washington State Department of Transportation, the conundrum was
  • February 11, 2013
    Oregon trials road user charging
    In Oregon, gas-tax money funds about 58 per cent of the budget used to take care of the state’s roads. As vehicles become more fuel efficient, the gas tax, which is 30 cents a gallon in Oregon and 37 cents in Washington, will generate less and less money. “If we’re using gasoline and diesel sales to fund our transportation system, we’re going to be in big trouble,” said Patrick Cooney of the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT). Recognizing the problem early, Oregon started studying alternatives to th
  • February 2, 2012
    Need for performance standards for road user charging systems
    GNSS-based road use metering systems need performance metrics, as well as ways to test and reliably compare them. Bern Grush and Joaquín Cosmen write about the function of the GNSS Metering Association for Road-use charging (GMAR), recently set up to address this issue
  • August 25, 2016
    HERMES Study provides guidance for forward ITS thinking in Finland
    Having authored HERMES, a major study for the Finnish Ministry of Transport and Communication, Josef Czako talks to ITS International about his findings and lessons for other authorities. When CEOs of major automakers are predicting more change in the next five years than in the past 50, what is the role of national authorities considering the benefits of innovations in ITS?