Skip to main content

ATFI disputes toll survey findings

According to a recent poll by infrastructure group HNTB, 79 per cent of US residents would support "would support the addition of a toll on a non-tolled surface transportation facility if it resulted in a safer, congestion-free and more reliable trip." The poll also found 83 per cent of its respondents would also support tolls on highways that are currently free, which has been a source of contentious debate in Washington. HNTB Toll Services Chairman Jim Ely said the finding bolstered the argument o
September 15, 2014 Read time: 3 mins
According to a recent poll by infrastructure group HNTB, 79 per cent of US residents would support "would support the addition of a toll on a non-tolled surface transportation facility if it resulted in a safer, congestion-free and more reliable trip."

The poll also found 83 per cent of its respondents would also support tolls on highways that are currently free, which has been a source of contentious debate in Washington.

HNTB Toll Services Chairman Jim Ely said the finding bolstered the argument of tolling advocates that federal rules limiting them to new highway lanes should be revisited in the next transportation funding debate.

"Tolling is becoming the solution of choice for generating additional user-based transportation revenue,” Ely said in a statement. “It’s a proven source of funding that’s being seriously considered for expanded use by cities, states and even the federal government with support from elected officials across the political spectrum.”

However, the anti-tolling Alliance for Toll-Free Interstates (ATFI) disputed the support for expanding tolling in the US was as high as the HNTB poll found, pointing to other surveys that have painted a more muddled picture of public opinion on the topic.

"It is not surprising that the results of a poll commissioned by a road building outfit that bills itself as a top 'consultant to toll authorities' would produce pro-tolling results," the anti-tolling group said in a statement to The Hill.

"Interestingly, another recent Rasmussen Reports poll contradicts those findings," the ATFI statement continued. "That survey concluded two-thirds of Americans oppose a White House plan to toll existing interstates. Serious discussions about the complex and technical issues involved with transportation funding are more helpful in honestly informing Americans than simple polls."

Tolling groups in DC were delighted when President Obama included language that would lift the current ban on states placing tolls on existing highway lanes in his proposal for a four-year, US$302 billion bill that was dubbed the Grow America Act.

Obama’s proposal would allow states to apply to the Department of Transportation for approval to install additional tolls on existing roads. Present law requires states to construct new lanes on highways that they want to toll, with the exception of pilot programs in states including Virginia, North Carolina and Missouri.

The anti-tolling group said there has been opposition in those states to expanding their use to existing highways.

"The incontrovertible facts are that citizens and lawmakers in Virginia, North Carolina, and Missouri have balked at the prospect of putting tolls on existing interstate lanes," the ATFI said. "Those real world responses provide more valuable insight into the public’s rejection of tolls than any poll."

Lawmakers meanwhile largely ignored Obama's transportation funding proposal, and they did not address the tolling provision in their temporary stopgap.

HNTB's Ely said the poll findings that were released on Thursday showed the tolling proposal should be revisited when the transportation funding comes up for a renewal again next year.

"Inflation, improved fuel economy, changing driving habits and rising construction costs have eaten away at the purchasing power of federal and state gas taxes,” he said. “The national survey suggests that many Americans agree that when it comes to fixing our Interstate system, improving trip reliability and reducing accidents, all funding sources, including tolls, should be on the table for consideration by America’s transportation leaders and policy makers.”

Related Content

  • US high-speed rail debate revisited
    August 18, 2014
    Two recent columns in the New York Times have revived the semi-dormant debate about the future of high-speed rail in America, according to an article by Innovation Briefs. The first column, by New York Times correspondent Ron Nixon, casts a sceptical eye on the Administration's high-speed rail program and concludes that "despite the administration spending nearly US$11 billion since 2009....the projects have gone mostly nowhere..." The second column, closely following the first, is an opinion piece by
  • IBTTA statement on State of the Union Address
    January 21, 2015
    Executive director and CEO of the International Bridge, Tunnel and Turnpike Association (IBTTA), Patrick D. Jones, has made a statement on the State of the Union Address, saying: “In his State of the Union Address tonight, President Obama said that Republicans and Democrats must work together to make critical repairs and improvements to our long-neglected transportation infrastructure. As the economy starts back on the right track, Congress can rescue this vital part of our economic engine from further d
  • Rural roads ‘critical to moving people and goods’
    June 25, 2015
    In his opening statement at the US Subcommittee on Highways and Transit Hearing on Meeting the Transportation Needs of Rural America, chairman Sam Graves said that even today, 71 per cent of all lane-miles of public roads and 73 per cent of all of the nation's bridges are located in rural areas. In his home state of Missouri, the role of rural roads is even more pronounced: 82 per cent of the public roads and 81 per cent of bridges are in rural areas, and these roads carry over 40 per cent of all travel in
  • EVs: Time for a rethink
    December 14, 2021
    Given a growing body of evidence that EVs are not the clean, green machines they are made out to be, Andrew Bunn suggests they can only be part of the puzzle – not the answer to environmental problems