Skip to main content

Foreign embassies 'owe £143m' in London congestion charges

Transport for London figures suggest US and Japanese diplomats owe the most
By Adam Hill May 21, 2024 Read time: 2 mins
Who's not paying? (© Anizza | Dreamstime.com)

Foreign embassies in UK capital London owe a total of £143.5m in unpaid congestion charge fees, according to Transport for London (TfL).

TfL's figures cover a 20-year period from 2003, when the charge was introduced, to the end of 2023.

At the top of the list are US diplomats, who owe £14.6m, TfL says, while the embassy of Japan owes £10m.

The congestion charge (which is separate from London's ultra-low emission zone charge) is a £15 daily fee to drive in the city centre from 7:00-18:00 Monday-Friday and 12:00-18:00 Saturday-Sunday and bank holidays. There is no charge between Christmas Day and New Year's Day.

Other embassies which TfL says owe significant money include India (£8.5m), Nigeria (£8.4m) and China (£7.9m).

At the bottom of the list, the Embassy of the Republic of Togo has the smallest outstanding debt - just £40.

TfL takes the situation seriously.

"We and the UK government are clear that the congestion charge is a charge for a service and not a tax," it says in a statement. 

"This means that diplomats are not exempt from paying it. The majority of embassies in London do pay the charge, but there remains a stubborn minority who refuse to do so, despite our representations through diplomatic channels."

"We will continue to pursue all unpaid congestion charge fees and related penalty charge notices and are pushing for the matter to be taken up at the International Court of Justice."

In a statement, the US embassy in London said: “In accordance with international law as reflected in the 1961 Vienna convention on diplomatic relations, our position is that the congestion charge is a tax from which diplomatic missions are exempt."

“Our longstanding position is shared by many other diplomatic missions in London.”

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • HGVs without safety equipment to be banned from London
    February 6, 2015
    Britain’s first Safer Lorry Scheme, a London-wide ban on any lorry not fitted with safety equipment to protect cyclists and pedestrians, has been given the go ahead by the mayor, Transport for London (TfL) and London Councils. The scheme received 90 per cent support in a public consultation Traffic orders implementing the scheme are currently being published. Installation of road signs at the London boundary, training of police officers and information campaigns with drivers and hauliers have all started
  • HGVs without safety equipment to be banned from London
    February 6, 2015
    Britain’s first Safer Lorry Scheme, a London-wide ban on any lorry not fitted with safety equipment to protect cyclists and pedestrians, has been given the go ahead by the mayor, Transport for London (TfL) and London Councils. The scheme received 90 per cent support in a public consultation Traffic orders implementing the scheme are currently being published. Installation of road signs at the London boundary, training of police officers and information campaigns with drivers and hauliers have all started
  • Over half of Luxembourg residents in favour of EVs
    October 2, 2017
    58% of residents in Luxembourg are willing to exchange their current car for an electric vehicle (EV), according to a report by TNS ILLres. The report comes as Luxembourg plans to deploy more recharging points for EVs and tax reductions following the latest tax reforms, the Rifkin study, which suggests only registrations of EVs will start from 2025.
  • Debating the future of in-vehicle systems
    December 6, 2012
    Industry experts talk to Jason Barnes about the legislative situation of current and future in-vehicle systems. Articles about technology development can have a tendency to reference Moore’s Law with almost indecent regularity and haste but the fact remains that despite predictions of slow-down or plateauing, the pace remains unrelenting. That juxtaposes with a common tendency within the ITS industry: to concentrate on the technology and assume that much else – legislation, business cases and so on – will m