Skip to main content

San Francisco switches back to e-tolling

The move follows a return to payment rules suspended due to Covid-19
By Ben Spencer January 7, 2021 Read time: 2 mins
The system is being implemented on all seven state-owned bridges including the San Francisco-Oakland Bay bridge (© Minnystock | Dreamstime.com)

San Francisco's Bay Area Toll Authority (Bata) has introduced an electronic toll collection system at all seven state-owned toll bridges. 

The system is operating at the Antioch, Benicia-Martinez, Carquinez, Dumbarton, Richmond-San Rafael, San Francisco-Oakland Bay and San Mateo-Hayward bridges.

The move marks a return of toll payment rules that were temporarily suspended last March due to the Covid-19 pandemic. 

Bata says drivers who pay tolls with FasTrak toll tag or a License Plate Account will see no difference in their statements. Patrons who are not enrolled in these programmes will receive a monthly invoice for all toll bridge crossings, the authority adds. 

FasTrak customers account for nearly three-quarters of all crossings at the state-owned toll bridges.

Automated, high-speed cameras will capture images of customers' number plates, and the FasTrak customer service centre will process the images and then mail an invoice to the address at which the vehicle is registered with the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV).

Drivers can open FasTrak accounts online and may also obtain FasTrak tags at select Costco and Walgreens stores. 

FasTrak tags purchased at Costco or Walgreens must be registered online. A $20 deposit per tag will apply if the account is not funded with a credit card.

The License Plate Account charges a credit card whenever the vehicle crosses a toll bridge and allows a user to make a one-time payment up to 30 days in advance of a bridge crossing or within 48 hours afterwards. 

Drivers who receive a monthly invoice will have 30 days to make a payment before facing a $25 penalty for each crossing. 

This penalty increases to $70 per crossing for motorists who neglect to return invoices with payment after 60 days. 

Those who do not return payment after the second penalty may have a hold put on their vehicle registration by the DMV or have the amount owed referred to a collection agency.


 

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Making the case for interstate tolling
    May 30, 2014
    A provision in the Grow America Act, introduced to Congress last month by Secretary of Transportation Anthony Foxx, proposes lifting a decades-old ban on tolling existing interstate general purpose lanes. According Daniel Papiernik, HNTB Corporation's mid-Atlantic toll services leader, writing in Roll Call, recent opposition to the proposal is short-sighted. He claims that relying on revenues derived from the gas tax is simply an unsustainable way of funding the nation’s aging roads, bridges and tunnels
  • Massachusetts moves to cashless tolling
    March 28, 2013
    Drivers in Massachusetts may no longer need to worry about having cash on hand as they hit toll roads. The Massachusetts Department of Transportation (MassDOT) is planning to replace every tollbooth in the state with electronic tolling systems that read E-ZPass transponders in cars and send monthly bills to drivers who use toll roads without passes. “We’re trying to look at doing things faster, more efficiently and provide more information to the public,” said MassDOT Highway Administrator Frank DePaola.
  • Debating a cost-effective means of road user charging
    July 20, 2012
    Does GPS/GNSS-based technology provide a cost-effective means of charging or tolling on a national or international level, or are the issues pertaining to effective enforcement an obstacle. Here, leading equipment manufacturers debate the issue.
  • Mounting benefits of dynamic tolling project
    January 30, 2012
    Wisconsin's four-year HOT lanes pilot project, launched in May 2008, cost US$18.8 million to construct. Halfway into the project, which uses variably priced, or dynamic, tolling to improve highway efficiency, the benefits are mounting. The problem was obvious, and frustrating, to anyone who ever sat in bumper-to-bumper traffic on State Route 167 and watched a lone car whiz by every 20 seconds or so in the carpool lane. But for planners at the Washington State Department of Transportation, the conundrum was