Skip to main content

Seleta Reynolds: 'Drivers don't pay full cost'

Newly-appointed chief innovation officer at LA Metro suggests congestion pricing will help
By Adam Hill August 29, 2022 Read time: 3 mins
Reynolds: 'We need to think about how do we make the consequences of people's transportation choices more transparent to them'

Seleta Reynolds, who has taken up a new role as chief innovation officer at LA Metro, has warned that there is an imbalance in the mobility system of Los Angeles, with car drivers heavily subsidised - and suggests congestion pricing may help 'level the playing field'.

In a wide-ranging interview with ITS International editor Adam Hill ahead of September’s 2022 ITS World Congress in Los Angeles, Reynolds said: “When you look at the way that we've allocated funding for public transit, and allocated road space between cars and people who aren't travelling by car, it's not equitable.”

Reynolds, who was general manager of Los Angeles Department of Transportation before recently taking the LA Metro role, said: "We need to think about how do we make the consequences of people's transportation choices more transparent to them? How do we begin to level the playing field between driving - which is a heavily subsidised activity - and taking transit, which we haven't invested in and subsidised in the same way. Congestion pricing offers an opportunity to do that, but we have to do it in a way that is incredibly mindful of inherent inequities that people struggle with currently and that doesn't exacerbate those."

Examples of car driver subsidies include the ubiquity of free parking. "There are places where you have to pay to park but we devote a tremendous amount of public space - I mean the streets themselves, which usually comprise about 18% of the public space in a city and Los Angeles is no different - we devote a tremendous amount of that public space to the free storage of private vehicles, instead of devoting it to things like bike lanes or transit-only lanes," Reynolds points out.

There is also the use of the infrastructure itself. “It’s not really a secret that for the interstate system, the road system, that we have, we do not have an adequate budget to keep it in a state of good repair indefinitely," she continues. "And while there are places that people pay fees to support the maintenance of that system, we don't pay nearly enough - we don't pay what it costs to keep it in a state of good repair. So those things are borne in other ways."

Low fuel prices are another issue. “Even though right now we're in a moment where the price of gas feels high to people, in general the way that we keep gas prices low kind of disguises all of the negative impacts that driving has on our on our society - in terms of air quality, in terms of traffic crashes. It doesn't cost a lot, generally speaking, to fill up your car and go for a drive. And so people don't really pay the full cost of the infrastructure they're using.”

Read the interview in ITS International Sept/Oct issue, out soon.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Jenoptik measures out the future
    June 15, 2022
    The speed of tech changes means Jenoptik is redrawing how it sees itself. Adam Hill catches up with Stefan Traeger and Kevin Chevis at Intertraffic Amsterdam to find out more about ‘extended reality’…
  • Comment: ‘Sleepwalk into a new dawn? No thanks’
    October 19, 2021
    We need a grown-up discussion about the possible societal effects of driverless vehicles
  • An honest relationship
    July 19, 2012
    Consider this: "the most important reform should be that of speed limits and the criteria by which they are set". And this: "a successful road safety solution reduces casualties and catches few people because offence rates are so low". Both statements come from the article on pages 28-30 of this issue on business models for automated enforcement. Both come from established figures in the field (respectively, Paolo Sodi of Sodi Scientifica and Geoff Collins of Speed Check Services); and both highlight the ya
  • APA supports automated work zone speed enforcement
    July 17, 2015
    A trade association representing the highway construction industry strongly supports automated enforcement of speed limits in work zones and Maryland's experience with a similarly designed program has had very good results, the association head has told a joint Pennsylvania House and Senate committee. According to PennDOT, 24 people were killed in work-zone crashes in 2014, eight more than in 2013. Additionally, there were 1,841 crashes in work zones last year, a slight decrease from the 1,851 crashes