Skip to main content

Peru highway speeds up incident detection time with Valerann

Average on Lima Expresa network was 12 minutes - now it's five with data fusion approach
By Adam Hill February 23, 2024 Read time: 2 mins
Traffic in Peru's capital, Lima (© Kirill Neiezhmakov | Dreamstime.com)

Peru’s Lima Expresa, a Vinci concession, says it has reduced detection of incidents on its highways following the introduction last year of Lanternn by Valerann.

The 25km road carries 180,000 vehicles per day, connecting the centre of Peru's capital Lima with the port and airport. 

Speaking on a webinar hosted by IBTTA, Francisco Chenguayen, general manager of Lima Expresa, explained that average incident detection time was 12 minutes, prior to the deployment of Lanternn. 

This could be quicker, he said, if the operator was looking at a monitor on the video wall which picked up the event. But in other cases it could be 20-25 minutes – with perhaps the incident only detected because the emergency services, such as the fire brigade, had arrived.

“Now the average is five minutes and there are events which are detected in even less time," confirmed Chenguayen. "This is helping a lot.”

The Lanternn by Valerann solution uses 'data fusion', bringing together information from a variety of sources such as Here and Waze as well as legacy infrastructure such as loops and cameras, to form a single view of traffic flow through the entire network. 

Michael Vardi, co-founder of Valerann, said: “Once you go to a data-centric approach which says 'bring me all the data sources, give me all the alerts from all the data sources', suddenly you have a complete view of what’s happening on the roads.”

Before, the control room was receiving around 400-450 alerts per week, but that has now doubled to 900-950 per week. With this increase comes some false positives, but Vardi explained that the company works to provide context for the customer, and narrow them down to the ones which require attention.

“Before Lanternn we didn’t know the exact time of the vehicle breaking down or when the accident took place because we had to move the camera around and identify it," Chenguayen confirmed. "So a driver could have been waiting for our support for 10-15 minutes before it was detected. Now we have the certainty that, as soon as something happens, we get that information.”

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Authorities look to MaaS for new solutions and cost savings
    July 18, 2017
    The structure of society and the way in which our cities work will be completely transformed by Mobility as a Service (MaaS), Finland’s minister of transport and communications Anne Berner, told ITS International’s recent MaaS Market conference 2017 in London. In her keynote address, Berner told a packed audience of more than 200 ITS professionals that MaaS has the potential to help governments around the world meet their big city targets such as the rate of employment, the environment, the efficient use of
  • Veronica O. Davis: "There really has to be a better way"
    November 7, 2023
    Is it possible to change a system whose attitudes seem entrenched? Veronica O. Davis, author of this year’s must-read transport book Inclusive Transportation, talks to Adam Hill
  • The benefit of Lidar: touch, don’t look
    September 28, 2020
    The benefits of Lidar as a safety device for automobiles rather than as an enabler for AVs are easy to overlook – but Dr Jun Pei of Cepton Technologies tells Adam Hill why that would be a big mistake
  • A global standard for enforcement systems – is it necessary?
    May 30, 2013
    Jason Barnes speaks to leading figures from the automated enforcement sector about whether a truly international standard for automated enforcement systems is necessary or can ever be achieved. Recent reports of further press controversy in the US over automated enforcement (see ‘Focusing on accuracy?’, ITS International raise again the issue of standards and what constitutes ‘good enough’ in terms of system accuracy and overall solution effectiveness. Comparatively, automated enforcement has always expe