Skip to main content

Peru highway speeds up incident detection time with Valerann

Average on Lima Expresa network was 12 minutes - now it's five with data fusion approach
By Adam Hill February 23, 2024 Read time: 2 mins
Traffic in Peru's capital, Lima (© Kirill Neiezhmakov | Dreamstime.com)

Peru’s Lima Expresa, a Vinci concession, says it has reduced detection of incidents on its highways following the introduction last year of Lanternn by Valerann.

The 25km road carries 180,000 vehicles per day, connecting the centre of Peru's capital Lima with the port and airport. 

Speaking on a webinar hosted by IBTTA, Francisco Chenguayen, general manager of Lima Expresa, explained that average incident detection time was 12 minutes, prior to the deployment of Lanternn. 

This could be quicker, he said, if the operator was looking at a monitor on the video wall which picked up the event. But in other cases it could be 20-25 minutes – with perhaps the incident only detected because the emergency services, such as the fire brigade, had arrived.

“Now the average is five minutes and there are events which are detected in even less time," confirmed Chenguayen. "This is helping a lot.”

The Lanternn by Valerann solution uses 'data fusion', bringing together information from a variety of sources such as Here and Waze as well as legacy infrastructure such as loops and cameras, to form a single view of traffic flow through the entire network. 

Michael Vardi, co-founder of Valerann, said: “Once you go to a data-centric approach which says 'bring me all the data sources, give me all the alerts from all the data sources', suddenly you have a complete view of what’s happening on the roads.”

Before, the control room was receiving around 400-450 alerts per week, but that has now doubled to 900-950 per week. With this increase comes some false positives, but Vardi explained that the company works to provide context for the customer, and narrow them down to the ones which require attention.

“Before Lanternn we didn’t know the exact time of the vehicle breaking down or when the accident took place because we had to move the camera around and identify it," Chenguayen confirmed. "So a driver could have been waiting for our support for 10-15 minutes before it was detected. Now we have the certainty that, as soon as something happens, we get that information.”

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Parifex selects Quanergy for Lidar deal
    July 20, 2021
    Parifex will use Quanergy M-Series 3D Lidar sensors in Vigie Double-Side enforcement system
  • Smart cameras offer real-time alerts
    April 10, 2014
    Intelligent traffic cameras open up a host of possibilities for traffic planners and controllers alike. If traffic management centres (TMCs) around the world are to cope with the increasing demands of growing traffic flows while maintaining or improving transport safety and efficiency, then video monitoring will have to be supplemented by automated warnings of incidents or deviations. According to Patrik Anderson, business development director at Swedish camera manufacturer Axis Communications, it is no
  • Editor's comment: 'We can’t meet in LA – but here’s the next best thing'
    September 17, 2020

    About now is traditionally the time that thoughts turn to the ITS World Congress – and this year is no different. Actually, that’s nonsense: this year is completely different. 

  • Reducing incident clear up times, saving money
    January 24, 2012
    In 2007 in Atlanta, Georgia, it took over four hours to open the road after a major commercial vehicle incident. Not any more. Four years ago the Texas Transportation Institute (TTI) cited Atlanta, Georgia as the third-most congested city in the United States. Each traveller in metro Atlanta lost an incredible 57 hours a year to traffic delays, wasting 40 gallons of fuel while sitting in traffic. In 2007, it took nearly four and a half hours to open travel lanes after an average tractor-trailer incident. Th