Skip to main content

Road usage charge pilot under way

The Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) is undertaking a pilot project to test the next generation of a road usage charge system designed to address funding gaps caused by a rise in fuel efficiency and a decline in gas tax revenue. Around forty volunteers have begun testing the new system, where, instead of paying the gas tax, automatically added at the pump, pilot participants will pay a per mile charge based on the number of miles they drive. The charge is roughly equal to the amount of gas tax the
November 22, 2012 Read time: 4 mins
RSSThe 5837 Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) is undertaking a pilot project to test the next generation of a road usage charge system designed to address funding gaps caused by a rise in fuel efficiency and a decline in gas tax revenue.

Around forty volunteers have begun testing the new system, where, instead of paying the gas tax, automatically added at the pump, pilot participants will pay a per mile charge based on the number of miles they drive. The charge is roughly equal to the amount of gas tax they would have paid for a vehicle that gets twenty miles to the gallon; most participants will be refunded gas taxes paid during the pilot.

ODOT focused on choice, transparency, ease of use and protection of privacy as they worked with private firms to develop the pilot system. Participants have a choice of five different plans involving a range of technologies and methods for reporting and paying. Drivers choose the way miles are reported with in-vehicle technology, some without GPS capability and others able to use it, or could opt out of in-vehicle technology altogether by paying a flat annual charge in lieu of a per-miles-travelled basis.  For the pilot, ODOT contracted with a private company, Toll operator Sanef, as an alternative to ODOT, to process payments and provide mileage reporting devices.

“This pilot will offer a peek into a future system where motorists will be responsible for choosing how they report their miles, from certified options, and also their account management provider,” explained Jim Whitty, Office of Innovative Partnerships Manager at DOT. “It’s critical that we learn what’s needed to create an open system that can adapt and change as technology and the market change.”

Whitty also noted that ODOT gathered valuable information from the first Road User Fee Pilot Project, completed in 2007, and is responding to those findings in this pilot.  “We are addressing the public’s concern about government involvement in several ways,” he said. “For example, the new concept envisions the state outsourcing system functions to the private sector as an alternative to the government, and we are testing that in this pilot as well.”

For pilot participants paying by the mile, a mileage reporting device plugged into a diagnostic port, located under the dashboard, reports the distance travelled. The reporting device only reports the number of miles driven, not where they are driven. The device wirelessly reports the miles driven to ODOT or Sanef, depending on the plan; ODOT or 480 Sanef provides a monthly bill to participants based on their reported road use.

The pilot includes three mileage reporting device choices:

  • The basic mileage reporting device reports the total number of miles driven only. This device does not include GPS and does not report the location of miles driven.
  •  A Smartphone application and basic mileage reporting device uses the basic device to report the total miles driven and a participant can activate an app on an Android Smartphone to determine which miles are driven outside of Oregon, for which drivers are not charged. If the app is not turned on, only the total miles driven are reported.
  • The advanced mileage reporting device reports the total number of miles driven and uses GPS to determine which miles are driven outside of Oregon, for which drivers are not charged.
“People wanted choices, so for this pilot, participants are choosing from several options for reporting and paying their bill.  ODOT won’t make the choice for technologies; the participants will do that,” Whitty said.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Underinvestment in infrastructure threatens economic growth
    January 24, 2012
    The 2011 Urban Mobility Report from the Texas Transportation Institute highlights the dangers of continued underinvestment in transportation infrastructure but also offers some hope in terms of possible solutions
  • Mobility itself is moving says cubic
    June 9, 2015
    Cubic’s Chris Bax looks at the challenges and benefits of implementing transport as a service. Imagine paying for travel in exactly the same way you buy your phone service. For example, you would pay a set amount in exchange for a monthly travel package covering up to 100km of free taxi journeys in your home city (including a guaranteed 15 minute pickup) and public transport usage within a 1,500km radius of your home. Not only would this option be cheaper than owning and maintaining your own car, you would
  • Australians ‘open to a fairer, more sustainable road funding system’
    September 12, 2016
    Australia’s first real-world trial of road charging options has found that motorists are open to a different way of paying for the nation’s roads. Transurban chief executive officer Scott Charlton said the first stage of the Melbourne Road Usage Study suggested a user-pays system could work in Australia, providing fair, sustainable and flexible funding for the infrastructure. The 18-month study, led by Transurban and supported by independent research and technology specialists, looked at how people used
  • Developing integrated transport networks
    September 20, 2012
    A major initiative in managing numerous transport networks as a single system has moved into a significant phase with design of sophisticated new ITS systems. Jon Masters reports. Detailed design work is under way on two pilot projects pursuing a common principle – that transportation can be made more efficient or effective if the various networks and modes of travel are managed as a whole system. This is the central tenet of the US Department of Transportation’s (USDOT) Integrated Corridor Management (ICM)