Skip to main content

Road usage charge pilot under way

The Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) is undertaking a pilot project to test the next generation of a road usage charge system designed to address funding gaps caused by a rise in fuel efficiency and a decline in gas tax revenue. Around forty volunteers have begun testing the new system, where, instead of paying the gas tax, automatically added at the pump, pilot participants will pay a per mile charge based on the number of miles they drive. The charge is roughly equal to the amount of gas tax the
November 22, 2012 Read time: 4 mins
RSSThe 5837 Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) is undertaking a pilot project to test the next generation of a road usage charge system designed to address funding gaps caused by a rise in fuel efficiency and a decline in gas tax revenue.

Around forty volunteers have begun testing the new system, where, instead of paying the gas tax, automatically added at the pump, pilot participants will pay a per mile charge based on the number of miles they drive. The charge is roughly equal to the amount of gas tax they would have paid for a vehicle that gets twenty miles to the gallon; most participants will be refunded gas taxes paid during the pilot.

ODOT focused on choice, transparency, ease of use and protection of privacy as they worked with private firms to develop the pilot system. Participants have a choice of five different plans involving a range of technologies and methods for reporting and paying. Drivers choose the way miles are reported with in-vehicle technology, some without GPS capability and others able to use it, or could opt out of in-vehicle technology altogether by paying a flat annual charge in lieu of a per-miles-travelled basis.  For the pilot, ODOT contracted with a private company, Toll operator Sanef, as an alternative to ODOT, to process payments and provide mileage reporting devices.

“This pilot will offer a peek into a future system where motorists will be responsible for choosing how they report their miles, from certified options, and also their account management provider,” explained Jim Whitty, Office of Innovative Partnerships Manager at DOT. “It’s critical that we learn what’s needed to create an open system that can adapt and change as technology and the market change.”

Whitty also noted that ODOT gathered valuable information from the first Road User Fee Pilot Project, completed in 2007, and is responding to those findings in this pilot.  “We are addressing the public’s concern about government involvement in several ways,” he said. “For example, the new concept envisions the state outsourcing system functions to the private sector as an alternative to the government, and we are testing that in this pilot as well.”

For pilot participants paying by the mile, a mileage reporting device plugged into a diagnostic port, located under the dashboard, reports the distance travelled. The reporting device only reports the number of miles driven, not where they are driven. The device wirelessly reports the miles driven to ODOT or Sanef, depending on the plan; ODOT or 480 Sanef provides a monthly bill to participants based on their reported road use.

The pilot includes three mileage reporting device choices:

  • The basic mileage reporting device reports the total number of miles driven only. This device does not include GPS and does not report the location of miles driven.
  •  A Smartphone application and basic mileage reporting device uses the basic device to report the total miles driven and a participant can activate an app on an Android Smartphone to determine which miles are driven outside of Oregon, for which drivers are not charged. If the app is not turned on, only the total miles driven are reported.
  • The advanced mileage reporting device reports the total number of miles driven and uses GPS to determine which miles are driven outside of Oregon, for which drivers are not charged.
“People wanted choices, so for this pilot, participants are choosing from several options for reporting and paying their bill.  ODOT won’t make the choice for technologies; the participants will do that,” Whitty said.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • National truck tolling scheme compensates for transit traffic
    July 13, 2012
    Q-Free's Per Frederik Ecker talks about the Slovak Republic's new truck tolling system, which is intended to compensate for the large amounts of transit traffic which passes through the country. In January this year Q-Free, together with Siemens, was awarded the contract to deliver the new national truck tolling scheme in the Slovak Republic. This will be operated by Slovakia SkyToll on a 13-year concession and Q-Free is supplying the central tolling and enforcement system, together with a three-year servic
  • Mounting benefits of dynamic tolling project
    January 30, 2012
    Wisconsin's four-year HOT lanes pilot project, launched in May 2008, cost US$18.8 million to construct. Halfway into the project, which uses variably priced, or dynamic, tolling to improve highway efficiency, the benefits are mounting. The problem was obvious, and frustrating, to anyone who ever sat in bumper-to-bumper traffic on State Route 167 and watched a lone car whiz by every 20 seconds or so in the carpool lane. But for planners at the Washington State Department of Transportation, the conundrum was
  • LGA report forecasts introduction of road tolling
    November 27, 2012
    A report by the Local Government Association (LGA), the organisation representing councils in England and Wales, predicts road tolling or pay as you drive road pricing could be introduced by 2018. With traffic predicted to nearly double over the next 25 years, the LGA believes the Government will have to consider tolls or even pay as you drive road pricing to raise the money it needs.
  • Most Americans would support higher gas taxes - under certain conditions
    September 3, 2015
    A telephone survey by the California-based Mineta Transportation Institute found that the majority of Americans would support higher fuel taxes, but only if the revenue is invested in specific transportation improvements. A gas fuel increase of 10 cents per gallon to improve road maintenance was supported by 71 per cent of respondents, whereas support levels dropped to just 31 per cent if the revenues were to be used more generally to maintain and improve the transportation system. The survey findings