Skip to main content

Fasten your seatbelts: it’s going to be a bumpy ride

A spat has broken out between two major US transportation organisations over how best to pay for road use: the ATA says tolls are ‘fake funding’ while IBTTA has scorned ‘scare tactics and falsehoods’… Much has been made of the state of US roads: everyone agrees that funding is needed – but who should pay? And how? Chris Spear, president and CEO of American Trucking Associationsm(ATA), believes finance is facing a cliff edge: the Highway Trust Fund (HTF), historically the primary source of federal revenue
June 26, 2018 Read time: 4 mins

A spat has broken out between two major US transportation organisations over how best to pay for road use: the ATA says tolls are ‘fake funding’ while IBTTA has scorned ‘scare tactics and falsehoods’…

Much has been made of the state of US roads: everyone agrees that funding is needed – but who should pay? And how? Chris Spear, president and CEO of 4626 American Trucking Associations (ATA), believes finance is facing a cliff edge: the Highway Trust Fund (HTF), historically the primary source of federal revenue for highway projects, will become insolvent by the end of 2020. “The $60 billion annual federal investment from the HTF still falls well short of the resources necessary to provide the federal share of the investment needed,” he says. A past Republican president, Ronald Reagan, came up with a plan in the 1980s to increase federal gas tax to cover costs, with the average car only hit (four decades ago) for about $30 a year.

Big and bold

Spear insists: “To rebuild our infrastructure for the long term we need a plan that isbig and bold, like President Reagan’s.” He adds that some kind of user fee is the way to go: “Any proposal that relies on fake funding schemes like highway tolls…will not generate the revenue necessary to make significant infrastructure improvements.” The 3804 International Bridge, Tunnel and Turnpike Association (IBTTA), perhaps unsurprisingly, was not impressed with this sideways dig at the value of tolling. Association CEO Patrick D. Jones issued a robust response: “It’s unfortunate that Spear insists on making misleading statements about tolling in his quest to increase fuel taxes and strengthen the federal HTF. We won’t solve our nation’s infrastructure funding crisis using only fuel tax-supported roads or only toll roads. We need both. While tolling isn’t the only solution, it is a proven and valuable tool in the toolbox that works very well under the right circumstances. There are no free roads. Tackling our complex transportation challenges will require honest dialogue, not scare tactics and falsehoods.” IBTTA’s contention is that some of the highest capacity, interstate quality highways in America would never have been built without tolling.

Build America

ATA has thought about what it wants. Spear says a ‘Build America Fund’ needs to be set up: a 20-cent-per-gallon user fee on all transportation fuels, including diesel, gasoline and natural gas, which would generate $340 billion over a decade - covering the highway funding gap and creating an account “to invest in the nation’s most urgent infrastructure needs”. ATA says this would cost the typical passenger vehicle driver just $2 per week, a little over $100 each year.

Spear strikes a chord when he says that ATA’s proposal is also “ fiscally conservative”, with 99 cents in every dollar collected from such a user fee “spent directly on the intended purpose of maintaining roads and bridges”.

“Compare that to other methods of infrastructure funding, like tolling — where as much as 35 cents of every dollar is wasted on administrative and overhead costs rather than on road maintenance,” he continues. “Congress can look in its own backyard where the toll for driving 10 miles on I-66 express lanes in Northern Virginia hit a ridiculous peak of $47.”

No comparison

IBTTA did not take this lying down. Spear is misleading, says Jones, because to compare the cost of collecting tolls with fuel taxes ignores one of the most fundamental cost advantages of toll finance: the time value of money.

“If we were to build a 50-mile toll road today, we would issue debt…and use the debt financing to build the entire road all at once, perhaps in as little as two years,” Jones says. “If we were to build that same road using fuel taxes, it would probably take us at least ten years or more to complete the project because only a small portion of the fuel tax revenue would be available each year.”

There would be increases in the cost of labour, materials, equipment - and another eight years’ of delays for all motorists, he adds.

Finally, IBTTA insists Spear’s comment about I-66 confuses a “priced managed lane” with a typical toll road. Also, “only .08 percent of express lane trips paid a toll higher than $40” anyway. Robust debate is good – and it looks as though this one will run and run. To misquote Bette Davis in All About Eve: “Fasten your seatbelts. It’s going to be a bumpy ride.”

Related Content

  • Asecap Days 2023: Data drives the best decisions
    December 22, 2023
    Almost all the data being collected by highway operators is going to waste. But if firms collect and analyse these ‘vast lakes of data’ they can investigate threats, monitor management systems and drive up revenues, delegates were told at Asecap Days 2023. Geoff Hadwick reports
  • The great pay divide
    April 2, 2014
    Public acceptance is crucial for the acceptance of managed and express lanes as Jon Masters discovers. Lists of proposed highway expansion projects introducing variably priced toll lanes continue to lengthen. Managed lanes, or express lanes to some, are gaining support as a politically favourable way of adding capacity and reducing acute congestion on principal highways. In Florida, for example, the managed lanes on the 95 Express are claimed to have significantly increased average peak-time speeds on tolle
  • Time to decide
    December 4, 2014
    The old fuel tax methods can no longer produce the funding required to maintain the infrastructure without a massive increase in duty rates. In this issue we get a variety of views on two of the hottest topics in transportation; financing models and Smart Cities.
  • London needs just one road user charge, says report
    July 8, 2019
    London’s patchwork of road charging schemes should be replaced by a single, distance-based user charge, according to new research. Apart from anything else, it would be much fairer… The UK capital’s multiple road charging schemes require a radical overhaul, according to a new report by the Centre for London thinktank. The suggested solution is to replace existing levies on drivers with a single, distance-based user charge which would more fairly reflect how much, and at what time, people are using London