Effectively tackle vehicle pollution

In 2008, Italy's first traffic charge named 'Ecopass' was launched in Milan in an attempt to reduce road congestion and pollution levels as well as to boost public transport through the re-investment of the pollution charge revenues.
January 25, 2012 Read time: 3 mins
In 2008, Italy's first traffic charge named 'Ecopass' was launched in Milan in an attempt to reduce road congestion and pollution levels as well as to boost public transport through the re-investment of the pollution charge revenues. Transport economist Cosimo Chiffi outlines the success of the project.

Background

The metropolitan area of Milan comprises around 4 million inhabitants and is the centre of the polycentric Lombardy region. Milan also has one of the highest rates of car ownership in the world, with 550 cars recorded per 1,000 citizens at the end of 2009. The high reliance on car use for travel in Milan, together with adverse geoclimatic conditions, results in high pollution levels.

In January 2008 the Mayor of Milan, Letizia Moratti, launched the Ecopass programme, a traffic pollution charge implemented as an urban toll for certain motorists travelling within a designated traffic restricted zone corresponding to the historic central area called Cerchia dei Bastioni, which covers around 8.2 km2.

The charging scheme is controlled by 43 toll gates, from 7.30am to 7.30pm, Monday to Friday. Ecopass is not a congestion pricing programme, like those implemented in London and Stockholm, but rather a variation of these: it was designed with the aim of targeting and charging the most polluting vehicles only, while drivers of green vehicles (cng, lpg, electric and hybrid) pay nothing and residents have some special rates.

Tariffs depend on the engine emission class by type of vehicle. For instance, car drivers pay 10 for a day ticket if they own an Euro 0 diesel car; but only €2 for Euro 1, 2 gasoline cars. The system is based on Automatic Number Plate Recognition (ANPR) technology. Cameras installed at each gate read plates so that the corresponding pollution standard is recorded and the charge is calculated.

Costs and benefits 2008-2009

The operating costs involved in implementing the Ecopass programme in the first year were around €6.5 million, while revenues were around €11.5 million, made up of Ecopass payments only. However, the real benefits to Milan were derived from reducing congestion and pollution through the program.

On average, car trips entering the city centre decreased by 14.4%, in the first year after the introduction of Ecopass. This was clearly reflected in a reduction of PM10 (-23%) and CO2 (-15%) inside the charging area. Car traffic outside of the central area also decreased, by 3.4%. There was a societal benefit through better takeup of public transport in the city: the Milanese public transport company registered a pronounced increase in passengers using the Metro (+6.2%) but also in total on the whole network in the area (+5.7%).

Project:
Cut traffic pollution and congestion in Milan, Italy

Operating Cost 2008-2009:
€6.5 million approx

Benefits:(first year)
•Toll revenues €11.5 million in 2008
•14.4% fewer car trips in target area
•Pollution cut by 23% PM10 and 15% CO2
•Increased use of public transport
•Dramatic increase in green vehicle useIn 2010 the pollution charging system started to lose its benefit over time because of the renewal of the vehicle fleet. Now, 80 per cent of the vehicles entering the traffic restricted zone do not have to pay any charge because they meet the required air quality standard. This has reduced the toll revenues to €10 million in 2009 and around €8 million in 2010, and the level of congestion has therefore increased by 1.8 per cent during the first 6 months of 2010 compared to the previous period in 2009.

The real benefit of the Ecopass programme was that it directly caused traffic composition to be modified. As expected, there has been a dramatic shift in the number of vehicles entering the charging area from tolled to toll-exempted vehicles: the most polluting vehicles now account for only 17 per cent, as against 47 per cent in 2008.

Looking to the future

In November 2010, an Advisory Committee nominated by the Municipality has suggested to follow the example of London: all vehicles entering the charging zone should have to pay a charge of €4 or even more.

Charging, Tolling & RUC

Related Content

  • Flexible, cost efficient bus trailers adapt to passenger demand
    January 25, 2012
    The cost, environmental and other benefits of the bus trailer concept are obvious. Used in several areas of Germany, as well as Austria, Switzerland, and Luxembourg, vehicle sizes can be adapted to passenger demand. The Ruebenacker group, a public transport provider in the Black Forest region of Germany, is one of more than 20 bus operators in the country that have deployed bus trailers, also referred to as bus trains. The company owns 81 buses and transports nearly six million passengers a year in the Blac
    Read More
  • New approach to real time travel information - free of charge
    February 3, 2012
    Austria's national road operator, ASFINAG, has launched the TMCplus traveller information service which is unusual in that it offers encrypted-level services to all users free of charge. Martin Müllner writes
    Read More
  • Wireless traffic management reduces costs and commute times
    January 30, 2012
    The County of Los Angeles is widely known for having among the worst traffic problems and the most road congestion in the US. To combat these problems, the Los Angeles County Department of Public Works decided to deploy a wireless communications system to connect over 1,000 of the most congested intersections so they could dynamically monitor and manage the congestion and reduce commute times.
    Read More
  • The cost benefits of LED traffic signals
    July 16, 2012
    On 11 January 2005, the Kentucky Transportation Cabinet (KYTC) began installing GELcore LED traffic signal modules state-wide through an Energy Savings Performance Contract. In tendering for the work, the energy service contractors could choose any manufacturers equipment but all of them proposed to use the GELcore brand.
    Read More

Highlighted Content