Effectively tackle vehicle pollution

In 2008, Italy's first traffic charge named 'Ecopass' was launched in Milan in an attempt to reduce road congestion and pollution levels as well as to boost public transport through the re-investment of the pollution charge revenues.
January 25, 2012 Read time: 3 mins
In 2008, Italy's first traffic charge named 'Ecopass' was launched in Milan in an attempt to reduce road congestion and pollution levels as well as to boost public transport through the re-investment of the pollution charge revenues. Transport economist Cosimo Chiffi outlines the success of the project.

Background

The metropolitan area of Milan comprises around 4 million inhabitants and is the centre of the polycentric Lombardy region. Milan also has one of the highest rates of car ownership in the world, with 550 cars recorded per 1,000 citizens at the end of 2009. The high reliance on car use for travel in Milan, together with adverse geoclimatic conditions, results in high pollution levels.

In January 2008 the Mayor of Milan, Letizia Moratti, launched the Ecopass programme, a traffic pollution charge implemented as an urban toll for certain motorists travelling within a designated traffic restricted zone corresponding to the historic central area called Cerchia dei Bastioni, which covers around 8.2 km2.

The charging scheme is controlled by 43 toll gates, from 7.30am to 7.30pm, Monday to Friday. Ecopass is not a congestion pricing programme, like those implemented in London and Stockholm, but rather a variation of these: it was designed with the aim of targeting and charging the most polluting vehicles only, while drivers of green vehicles (cng, lpg, electric and hybrid) pay nothing and residents have some special rates.

Tariffs depend on the engine emission class by type of vehicle. For instance, car drivers pay 10 for a day ticket if they own an Euro 0 diesel car; but only €2 for Euro 1, 2 gasoline cars. The system is based on Automatic Number Plate Recognition (ANPR) technology. Cameras installed at each gate read plates so that the corresponding pollution standard is recorded and the charge is calculated.

Costs and benefits 2008-2009

The operating costs involved in implementing the Ecopass programme in the first year were around €6.5 million, while revenues were around €11.5 million, made up of Ecopass payments only. However, the real benefits to Milan were derived from reducing congestion and pollution through the program.

On average, car trips entering the city centre decreased by 14.4%, in the first year after the introduction of Ecopass. This was clearly reflected in a reduction of PM10 (-23%) and CO2 (-15%) inside the charging area. Car traffic outside of the central area also decreased, by 3.4%. There was a societal benefit through better takeup of public transport in the city: the Milanese public transport company registered a pronounced increase in passengers using the Metro (+6.2%) but also in total on the whole network in the area (+5.7%).

Project:
Cut traffic pollution and congestion in Milan, Italy

Operating Cost 2008-2009:
€6.5 million approx

Benefits:(first year)
•Toll revenues €11.5 million in 2008
•14.4% fewer car trips in target area
•Pollution cut by 23% PM10 and 15% CO2
•Increased use of public transport
•Dramatic increase in green vehicle useIn 2010 the pollution charging system started to lose its benefit over time because of the renewal of the vehicle fleet. Now, 80 per cent of the vehicles entering the traffic restricted zone do not have to pay any charge because they meet the required air quality standard. This has reduced the toll revenues to €10 million in 2009 and around €8 million in 2010, and the level of congestion has therefore increased by 1.8 per cent during the first 6 months of 2010 compared to the previous period in 2009.

The real benefit of the Ecopass programme was that it directly caused traffic composition to be modified. As expected, there has been a dramatic shift in the number of vehicles entering the charging area from tolled to toll-exempted vehicles: the most polluting vehicles now account for only 17 per cent, as against 47 per cent in 2008.

Looking to the future

In November 2010, an Advisory Committee nominated by the Municipality has suggested to follow the example of London: all vehicles entering the charging zone should have to pay a charge of €4 or even more.

Charging, Tolling & RUC

Related Content

  • London tops global congestion ranking, says report
    March 15, 2016
    The Inrix Traffic Scorecard 2015, which measures progress in improving urban mobility, reveals strong economic growth and record population levels resulting in London becoming the first city to surpass 100 hours wasted per driver in gridlock. The report analysed traffic congestion in more than 100 cities worldwide. London topped the list, with drivers wasting an average of 101 hours, or more than four days, in gridlock in 2015. Across the UK, drivers spent 30 hours on average in delays last year, consist
    Read More
  • The twisting path to enforcement’s future
    June 5, 2014
    Survey reveals some division of views about enforcement’s future as Colin Sowman discovers. Technological advances and legislative changes pose many questions for those involved in road enforcement, ranging from the changing demands of privacy and data protection legislation to the practicalities on multi-speed enforcement. So to get the industry’s views ITS International took soundings on some of these bigger questions. In a world where many vehicles are fitted with GPS linked ‘black box’ telematics system
    Read More
  • Shotl goes the extra mile for mobility
    March 30, 2022
    Villages and residential suburbs can be good places to live, but often lack public transport facilities. Buses tend to be infrequent and, where they exist, often require public subsidies.
    Read More
  • Varying acceptance of tolling in Africa
    January 6, 2016
    Tolling technology is now at an advanced state but governments have a key role in ensuring the success of schemes as is evident in Africa. Shem Oirere reports. According to the African Development Bank, the continent has an estimated $46bn of infrastructure financing deficit. The bank says sub-Saharan Africa requires $93bn annually to meet its infrastructure development needs - but only half of the financing is available.
    Read More

Highlighted Content