Skip to main content

US shutdown: transport bore the brunt

The longest-ever shutdown in US government history may be over – but it has had an impact on transportation infrastructure, says Mary Scott Nabers of Strategic Partnerships The impact of the longest government shutdown in history has spread far beyond government workers and their families. It is difficult to find any business, school, hospital, city, county, college, university or local government organisation that has not suffered as a result of the shutdown. The negative impact on retail establishments
February 20, 2019 Read time: 4 mins
The fiscal stand-off between president Donald Trump and the US Congress led to a 35-day shutdown which ended on 25 January
The longest-ever shutdown in US government history may be over – but it has had an impact on transportation infrastructure, says Mary Scott Nabers of 8896 Strategic Partnerships


The impact of the longest government shutdown in history has spread far beyond government workers and their families. It is difficult to find any business, school, hospital, city, county, college, university or local government organisation that has not suffered as a result of the shutdown. The negative impact on retail establishments of all types, farmers, contractors, social service organisations and citizen workers has been great as well. It strikes at the heart of the country’s economic stability and it is devastating for issues related to the nation’s crumbling infrastructure.

At a time when taxpayers and citizens thought the country would be involved in addressing the nation’s deteriorating infrastructure, the government shutdown halted thousands of transportation projects.

Anticipated funding


Since 1 October, local transportation districts waited in vain for federal funding that was anticipated. Public officials were already struggling because of limited resources. At the start of the country’s new fiscal year, government was open only because of a continuing resolution and that caused a significant reduction in federal disbursements that were earmarked for local government coffers. Only 25% of $55 billion which had been allocated for highway and federal transit projects was ever released from Washington, DC. Adding more stress was the fact that the continuing resolution also kept all funding at 2018 levels, leaving states without the increased revenue Congress had approved for 2019.

Now, because of the government shutdown, all new funding stalled as well. That stoppage won’t be reversed quickly under any circumstances. Even though government is open again, transportation funding will face uncertainties, red tape and bureaucratic processes in Congress. The delays will continue to curtail hundreds of critical construction projects. Projected costs will increase and taxpayers will pay more.

Transit agencies know there may still be no way for them to apply for grants to fund new construction projects. That’s because the Federal Transit Authority (FTA) typically only makes grants available at certain times during a fiscal year. And, the FTA must have five months’ worth of appropriations for grant applications to be accepted. So far, in the 2019 fiscal year, there have only been three months of appropriations. That will cause inevitable delays.

The 5628 National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) has been unable to handle the accident investigations that it is mandated to investigate.

Cancelled bidding


The state of Oklahoma had stopped accepting bids for transportation projects that were valued at about $137 million. These projects were supposed to be federally funded. Oklahoma transportation officials announced that bidding on projects that had been valued at $102 million was cancelled. Other bidding on projects valued at $36 million scheduled for February may also be halted. The state of Oklahoma receives about 57% of its highway and transit funding from federal agencies.

The state of Virginia provided advances on state transit funding to avoid problems caused by the federal government shutdown. However, numerous other transportation projects will be delayed. Significant state-wide rail projects that were expected to move forward this year will be disrupted since federal approvals are required for the Long Bridge expansion between DC and Virginia.


Montana’s Department of Transportation has nine projects that will likely be stalled. If so, the delay will impact the timeline of projects for the rest of the year.

New Mexico has stalled transportation projects and purchases. Safety concerns were the reason for new buses to transport people back and forth on Route 66 in Albuquerque.  The bus project was halted by city officials and 50 transportation projects were on hold.

The longer a shutdown lasts, the more devastating the impact on transportation infrastructure as well as almost every other industry sector.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Russia invests in ITS technology
    May 11, 2012
    Russia’s transport systems are developing on a grand scale with ITS central to the plans, thanks in no small part to a recently relaunched ITS Russia. Jon Masters interviews the organisation’s chief executive officer Vladimir Kryuchkov Over coming years many of the biggest deployments of new technology for transport are likely to be seen in Russia. For a political and economic superpower, the world’s biggest country has only recently started to harness ITS for the good of its transport networks. But the sca
  • The long road to Spanish enlightenment
    October 22, 2018
    Julián Núñez, immediate past president of ASECAP, gets his teeth into the vision of a European strategy for toll roads. David Arminas reports from Madrid. Getting European politicians to agree to a long-term cross-border highway infrastructure programme for toll roads is extremely difficult. It’s a bit like pulling teeth: people want to avoid the pain. But pain is something that Spanish operators, including Abertis, OHL, ACS, FCC and Acciona, have been going through for the past decade. The country has
  • Time for a rethink on road user charging
    February 1, 2012
    There is no value in further US VMT charging trials, except to delay the inevitable. These trials should end after completion of the University of Iowa's National Evaluation of a Mileage-based Road User Charge. There is far greater promise in unleashing private operators to commence profitable, non-tolling services, then using these for toll assessment and collection as fuel distributors are currently used to collect fuel taxation. Bern Grush writes
  • Congestion pricing - no such thing as a free ride
    October 2, 2018
    The widespread adoption of autonomous vehicles is likely to increase congestion, many experts believe. But Wes Guckert of Traffic Group believes that tolling could provide the answer. While it is still hard to wrap your head around the idea of getting into a vehicle without a driver, the industry is now used to hearing, reading, participating in the advancement of autonomous vehicles (AVs). Those in the industry have heard about Uber delivering a shipment of Budweiser, or the convoy of driverless trucks