Skip to main content

Upgrading New Yorks's traffic signal timings

The New York City Department of Transportation instituted the Midtown in Motion project to promote multimodal mobility in the Midtown Core of Manhattan, a 110 square block area or “zone” from Second to Sixth Avenue and 42nd to 57th Street. Control extended from 86th Street to 23rd Street, focused on the core zone. MiM provides signal timing changes on two levels: Level 1 control starts from a pre-stored library of timing plans. These are designed offline and are relevant to arterials inside the Midtown stud
February 28, 2013 Read time: 3 mins
The programme of upgrading intersection traffic signals has been one of three main building blocks in New York’s modernization plan (Pic: Aftab Uzzaman)
The 5590 New York City Department of Transportation instituted the Midtown in Motion project to promote multimodal mobility in the Midtown Core of Manhattan, a 110 square block area or “zone” from Second to Sixth Avenue and 42nd to 57th Street. Control extended from 86th Street to 23rd Street, focused on the core zone.

MiM provides signal timing changes on two levels: Level 1 control starts from a pre-stored library of timing plans. These are designed offline and are relevant to arterials inside the Midtown study area. As a result of applying these specially designed timing plans, traffic progression patterns are adjusted, serving the overall purpose of regulating traffic into Midtown, thereby enhancing mobility inside the study area.

Level 1 control of the system alerts operators in the NYCDOT Traffic Management Centre (TMC) to changes in travel time and ve­hicle speed and recommends signal timing adjustments. The opera­tor then reviews video cameras and other sources of information in the vicinity of the flagged avenue to identify the cause for the change in travel time. The TMC supervisor then decides the appropriate course of action to handle the event, which could be signal timing adjustments or requesting that NYPD address the situation.

To evaluate the system’s performance, a comparison of travel time by roadway segments was carried out. Based on the testing to date, in general the average speed improved noticeably. Speeds on approaches to the zone reduced to some degree as expected. Overall (inside and outside the zone) speeds improved, however.

Level 2 control is a split adjustment based on Severity Index (SI) which is related to an estimate of queue length (traffic congestion) by approach. The longer the queue is, the bigger the SI. The control algorithm attempts to reallocate green time between approaches to reduce queuing if possible and to achieve equity between the ap­proaches. Under the current implementation, the splits are adjusted at every third signal cycle.

Level 2 can reduce queuing while achieving equity during the period, where feasible. This will vary by intersection. Level 2 imple­mentation suggests that there are intervals wherein the ‘splits’ (time allocated for the green signal) can be adjusted to better service either the avenue or crosstown street, which is part of the objectives of MiM.

The extensive sensor network is enabling a rich data archive to be built. Combined with the record of actions taken and experience gained, this data will allow new traffic management plans to be de­veloped.

The data now available due to the city’s ITS sensor network, suit­ably analysed and combined with operational experience, confirms a basic principle – that significant variation in the zone is the norm. While there are clear aggregate patterns, daily fluctuations require active traffic management that is designed to anticipate that reality.

  • This is an edited extract from a paper presented by NYCDOT deputy director for systems engineering, Mohamad Talas, at the 19th ITS World Congress in Vienna, Austria, in October 2012. For a copy of the full paper, email %$Linker: 2 Email <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-16"?><dictionary /> 0 0 0 oLinkEmail [email protected] NYCTOT false mailto:[email protected] true false%>.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Bird establishes board to help increase safety for e-scooter riders
    August 14, 2018
    US electric mobility company Bird has formed a global safety advisory board to implement campaigns and products to improve the safety for riders using electric scooters. The board will also seek to improve the safety of pedestrians and cyclists who share space with riders using low-speed e-scooters. Additionally, Bird intends to carry on working with cities through its Save Our Sidewalks pledge to boost rider safety and improve the quality of bikes lanes. The scope of the work includes repainting an
  • Speed management safety site launched for transport planners
    January 31, 2019
    Speeding causes many road crashes – and this is the motivation behind a new, free digital tool from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). The Speed Management for Safety interactive website provides an overview of available resources for evaluating, designing, implementing and enforcing safe speeds, and covers such areas as creating a speed management initiative and road design. It also hosts a community portal where transport professionals can post questions and case studies or just talk to p
  • UK reviews MaaS, data and micromobility regulation
    March 27, 2019
    Mobility as a Service (MaaS), transport data and micromobility are to be the subject of new regulatory review by the UK government. Zero-emission vehicles, driverless vehicles (AVs) and drones are already under similar review. But in a document, Future of Mobility: Urban Strategy, maps out how the country’s Department of Transport will approach other mobility opportunities – and challenges. “This is the moment to reflect on what we as a society want these changes to deliver and what we want our urban
  • 2getthere calls for stricter AV regulations
    April 13, 2018
    Authorities will have to introduce strict regulations to ensure the safe introduction of autonomous vehicles (AVs) on public roads, according to a white paper published by Utrecht-based company 2getthere. Called Safety in Autonomous Transit, the report states that authorities should set more firm conditions on road safety, reliability and availability of these vehicles and also for the spatial planning of public areas where AVs operate. 2getthere highlights that governments will have to set tighter