Skip to main content

Upgrading New Yorks's traffic signal timings

The New York City Department of Transportation instituted the Midtown in Motion project to promote multimodal mobility in the Midtown Core of Manhattan, a 110 square block area or “zone” from Second to Sixth Avenue and 42nd to 57th Street. Control extended from 86th Street to 23rd Street, focused on the core zone. MiM provides signal timing changes on two levels: Level 1 control starts from a pre-stored library of timing plans. These are designed offline and are relevant to arterials inside the Midtown stud
February 28, 2013 Read time: 3 mins
The programme of upgrading intersection traffic signals has been one of three main building blocks in New York’s modernization plan (Pic: Aftab Uzzaman)
The 5590 New York City Department of Transportation instituted the Midtown in Motion project to promote multimodal mobility in the Midtown Core of Manhattan, a 110 square block area or “zone” from Second to Sixth Avenue and 42nd to 57th Street. Control extended from 86th Street to 23rd Street, focused on the core zone.

MiM provides signal timing changes on two levels: Level 1 control starts from a pre-stored library of timing plans. These are designed offline and are relevant to arterials inside the Midtown study area. As a result of applying these specially designed timing plans, traffic progression patterns are adjusted, serving the overall purpose of regulating traffic into Midtown, thereby enhancing mobility inside the study area.

Level 1 control of the system alerts operators in the NYCDOT Traffic Management Centre (TMC) to changes in travel time and ve­hicle speed and recommends signal timing adjustments. The opera­tor then reviews video cameras and other sources of information in the vicinity of the flagged avenue to identify the cause for the change in travel time. The TMC supervisor then decides the appropriate course of action to handle the event, which could be signal timing adjustments or requesting that NYPD address the situation.

To evaluate the system’s performance, a comparison of travel time by roadway segments was carried out. Based on the testing to date, in general the average speed improved noticeably. Speeds on approaches to the zone reduced to some degree as expected. Overall (inside and outside the zone) speeds improved, however.

Level 2 control is a split adjustment based on Severity Index (SI) which is related to an estimate of queue length (traffic congestion) by approach. The longer the queue is, the bigger the SI. The control algorithm attempts to reallocate green time between approaches to reduce queuing if possible and to achieve equity between the ap­proaches. Under the current implementation, the splits are adjusted at every third signal cycle.

Level 2 can reduce queuing while achieving equity during the period, where feasible. This will vary by intersection. Level 2 imple­mentation suggests that there are intervals wherein the ‘splits’ (time allocated for the green signal) can be adjusted to better service either the avenue or crosstown street, which is part of the objectives of MiM.

The extensive sensor network is enabling a rich data archive to be built. Combined with the record of actions taken and experience gained, this data will allow new traffic management plans to be de­veloped.

The data now available due to the city’s ITS sensor network, suit­ably analysed and combined with operational experience, confirms a basic principle – that significant variation in the zone is the norm. While there are clear aggregate patterns, daily fluctuations require active traffic management that is designed to anticipate that reality.

  • This is an edited extract from a paper presented by NYCDOT deputy director for systems engineering, Mohamad Talas, at the 19th ITS World Congress in Vienna, Austria, in October 2012. For a copy of the full paper, email %$Linker: 2 Email <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-16"?><dictionary /> 0 0 0 oLinkEmail [email protected] NYCTOT false mailto:[email protected] true false%>.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Worries as Huawei given role in UK’s 5G network
    April 24, 2019
    Alarm has been expressed by MPs over the UK government’s decision to allow Chinese firm Huawei to work on the UK’s 5G network. Prime minister Theresa May has banned Huawei from supplying ‘core’ parts of the country’s 5G infrastructure – but is believed to have given the green light for it to help deliver what are being called ‘non-core’ parts. As well as being for mobile phones, 5G is the technology which will be used to improve connectivity of autonomous vehicles and traffic controls. However, there ar
  • Siemens shows new Sitraffic sX at Intertraffic
    March 25, 2014
    A ‘game changer’ has been unveiled on the Siemens stand in the form of the Sitraffic sX, a new generation traffic lights and detectors controller, which can be updated remotely from internet enabled devices without interrupting normal operation. This enables the system to be remotely controlled and managed in real-time using devices such as a tablet while still ensuring intersection safety and reducing downtime.
  • EDI webinar - iCITE Data Aggregator DA-300
    January 24, 2017
    Eberle Design (EDI) is re-broadcasting its 45 minute webinar on the EDI and Reno A&E (RAE) iCITE Data Aggregator DA-300 on 31 January at 0900 MST/1000 EST. The webinar will show traffic operations technicians and traffic engineers how the data aggregator monitors and reports on mission critical traffic cabinet or intersection faults via SMS or email. It will also feature an update on the G2 User Interface. Co-presented by EDI vice president of Business Development Dr Bill Sowell and Technical Product
  • ITF study: shared mobility can cut congestion and CO2 emissions
    October 12, 2017
    A new ITF mobility study in Helsinki confirms that a combination of 6-seater shared taxis and taxi buses can carry out all of today’s car journeys in the city area with just 4% of the current number of privately owned vehicles. These shared mobility platforms also mean fewer changes, less waiting and shorter travel times compared to traditional public transport. In addition, the results confirm improved access to jobs and public services, most notably for citizens in areas with few such offers.