One of the first goals of Mobility as a Service (
     
The ATL is tasked with approving a cohesive regional transit plan that offers a seamless transportation experience across agencies like the 
     
 
Travel options
     
Unlike regional authorities set up in other US cities (which continue to be primarily funded by local taxes), Atlanta’s new structure allows local governments the option of pursuing a transit special local option sales tax. 
     
Last year the City of Atlanta and the State of Georgia also supported ITS International’s MaaS Market conference at which one of the delegates was state employee Merryl Mandus. “As I listened to the presenters, MaaS started to sound appealing,” says Mandus who is general counsel for Georgia’s State Road and Tollway Authority (SRTA), the independent body that operates Georgia’s tolled facilities and acts as its transportation financing arm. SRTA manages Georgia’s Express Lanes, administers the Atlanta region’s vanpool programme and manages the Xpress regional commuter coach transit service. 
     
“I felt that if our mission was to provide mobility options for citizens, then I should try to some extent to ‘walk the walk’ and not just ‘talk the talk’,” she explains. “So I took a serious look at my travel options and in November I got rid of my car. We are now a one-car household. What’s more, we’re saving a lot of money and I’m enjoying the freedom.”
     
Mandus lives around 12km (7.5 miles) from her office which, fortunately, sits above a Marta station. As her home is 1.5km (one mile) from the nearest Marta station, she uses either a ride-hailing service or is dropped off by her fiancé. “Then I’m on the train and off to work – it’s a pleasure. I still do drive at times and that last mile to work is an absolute pain in the neck – it’s a real problem.”
 
Cost savings
     
In terms of  travel times, they are roughly equal on the morning commute and can be  quicker on the way home. “Because the trains come every 10 minutes at  peak times, I don’t pay attention to the timetable. When I finish work, I  walk down to the station and if there is a train waiting then I will  get home faster than driving. I’m not going to stress about making any  particular train and if I’ve just missed one then that extra 10 minutes’  wait evens up the door-to-door travel time. It saves me money and it  saves me stress and, in many ways, I feel the stress is more important  than the money. When you sit in traffic it not only eats up time but it  is stressful and many people don’t realise the stress traffic congestion  causes - until they stop doing it. 
     
Taking  the transit option also saves her approximately $325 per month. “I have  to pay for Marta tickets, occasionally Uber, and there are still costs  attached to running the remaining car,” she explains. “But perhaps more  importantly, I don’t need to worry about making a car payment, other  costs of maintaining a car and I can’t overemphasise the freedom in not  having to deal with a car – it’s a pleasure.”
     
However,  while the savings may be edging towards $4,000 per year, financially  the case for making the switch is not as overwhelming as it may first  appear. “I did the analysis and while I live only a mile away from the  station, if I had to take an Uber or Lyft twice a day, it just wouldn’t  be worth it and I might as well keep the car. Without the option of  ride-hailing, I would not have made this change.” 
     
Does  she miss anything about commuting by car?  “I did use the time stuck in  traffic to make personal phone calls. I don’t get to do that anymore  and that’s my big trade-off - but it’s not a bad deal.” 
     
 
Commuters deterred
     
What  if that journey wasn’t as convenient, would she still use transit? “If I  had to take a bus to the Marta station then I probably wouldn’t do it  but it does work well for us and our employment situation. Having a  train station beneath my office was a huge factor and even if I had to  walk a block or so that wouldn’t have deterred me from making the  change. However, if at either end it was a couple of miles away from the  station, I don’t know if I would have done it.”
     
What  if the trains ran only once an hour, would that deter her from using  Marta? She says no - but it would make her more diligent about  timekeeping to ensure she caught the chosen service.
 
     
With  a food store  across the street from the Marta station near her home,  it is possible  to get provisions as and when needed - although for  other shopping trips  Mandus usually uses the car. She also drives to  work if she has a  meeting that may run past normal office hours and  into the evening – and  this typifies the need for confidence in the  reliability of transit and  security of travellers. Even where services  are assured, travelling on  shared public services can be intimidating  for the young and elderly,  lone females and minorities. 
     
“That’s   a very real issue,” says Mandus who made a presentation about   harassment on public transit to this year’s Transportation Research   Board (TRB) meeting. “When I am working and using transit during the day   I am definitely not concerned. Marta does a lot to ensure people see   the police officers at the stations and there is a ‘See and Say’   programme which has improved the situation enormously. The police were   always there but now they wear high- visibility clothing and so you can   see them and it is wonderful. However, as I talk to women it is clear   that harassment is a real concern.” 
     
 
Room for improvement
     
Looking   at the broader picture, now that Mandus is experiencing Marta’s   services more frequently, are there things that could be improved?   “There is always room for improvement in any industry and that’s exactly   what the ATL board is focusing on – making transit attractive,   including the use of technology to help travellers.” 
     
Initial   moves include aligning the technology between all the various mobility   agencies so the public have more options than just driving into the  city  in the general-purpose lanes.  
     
“Personally,   I would like the level of convenience I enjoy made available to others  –  expanding that first/last mile to two miles,” she emphasises. “For   Atlanta, building more track is so expensive so I would suggest bus   rapid transit [BRT] as the most economical way to go.”
     
Mandus   concludes: “I am thrilled to be a one-car household as it happens to   work for us. The challenge ahead is to make it work for a large   proportion of citizens in the Atlanta region.”
    
        
        
        



