Scorecard scores

For situations where normal cost-benefit analysis doesn't work, TNO has developed Scorecard. How can governments ascertain the best strategy for implementing innovative solutions that are influenced by knowledge and technology as well as political context, human behaviour, impact on process and organisation? TNO, the Netherlands-headquartered applied scientific research organisation, has created a scorecard that helps assess developments like SAFESPOT, the major European project which is designing cooperati
July 30, 2012 Read time: 4 mins
RSS

For situations where normal cost-benefit analysis doesn't work, TNO has developed Scorecard.

How can governments ascertain the best strategy for implementing innovative solutions that are influenced by knowledge and technology as well as political context, human behaviour, impact on process and organisation? TNO, the Netherlands-headquartered applied scientific research organisation, has created a scorecard that helps assess developments like SAFESPOT, the major European project which is designing cooperative systems for road safety based on Vehicle-to-Vehicle (V2V) and Vehicle-to-Infrastructure (V2I) communication.

SAFESPOT is defined through eight business models and two service models which needed to be ranked. This is usually done using a cost-benefit analysis based on financial factors. However, as TNO points out, not all criteria to select or rank service and business models can be monetarised so the development of an alternative method for nominal ranking by non-financial criteria from a governmental perspective to supplement cost-benefit analysis was necessary. This would allow governments to choose the most appropriate business model in
terms of aspects like political or cultural preferences.

After desk research on several government-driven areas (environment, agriculture, industry and innovation) to identify criteria which could not be distilled into financial elements, TNO developed a non-financial scorecard to rank service and business models according to the criteria found.

Six distinctive non-financial criteria were found in several studies on the effectiveness of governance intervention:

  • Economic Governance Role: the governmental role as, for example, civil service or as infrastructure investor;
  • Innovation Management: realising ideas or inventions to projects, stimulating public debate or setting the legal and financial framework to bring invention to innovation;
  • Economic Instruments: best instrument or policy given the political setting, realigning rights or possibilities of groups or individuals, setting and issuing permits, quotas and concessions, determining fees and so on;
  • Method of Transfer: budget subsidies, public provision, capital cost subsidies or setting an (inter)national market framework;
  • Governance Impact: the cost-effectiveness of policy (comparing return on cost of resources); and
  • Innovation Specifications: how the characteristics of the invention, the government drivers and way 'lessons learned' can be incorporated.

Scorecard

TNO says the scorecard built on these six criteria enables the potential effect of a governmental strategy to deploy developments like SAFESPOT to be ascertained. Each score is a qualitative statement describing which government strategy is preferred or needed in the given business and service models. The criteria therefore help to rank the models separately from their purely cost-benefit ratio.

This TNO scorecard was new to the partners in the SAFESPOT project when it was first presented. The approach was considered a promising way to allow countries from the EU-27 to select the most suitable government strategy to implement SAFESPOT services and techniques. TNO says it is now looking forward to developing and validating this instrument as a valuable addition to regular cost-benefit analysis.

What price reliability?

An international meeting on values of travel time reliability and cost-benefit analysis, being held 15-16 October, 2009 in Vancouver, Canada, will focus on a major issue that should be addressed when assessing transport investment options - unreliability of travel times.

Co-organised by the Strategic Highway Research Program (SHRP2) of the US 856 Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, the Joint Transport Research Centre of the OECD and the 998 International Transport Forum, the event recognises that at present, network and service reliability is not systematically incorporated in the transport planning process. Indeed, reliability is rarely factored into cost-benefit analyses, the core planning tool for surface transport networks.

As the organisers point out, research has not yet resulted in a set of generally accepted monetary valuations and the value placed on reliability varies from project to project. Knowledge on how travel time, congestion and service quality of the network affect reliability is largely missing. Notwithstanding, a few countries have recently taken effective steps to incorporate reliability into cost-benefit assessment and transport decision-making.

This international meeting is designed to bring together researchers and decision-makers to examine recent research results and country experiences on reliability measurement, valuation and, in particular, to explore successful practices in integrating reliability into cost-benefit analysis. The meeting aims at identify methodologies for incorporating reliability into project evaluation, and to explore the pitfalls that need to be avoided.


RSS

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Signal optimisation reduces congestion, improves travel times
    February 2, 2012
    The Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County's Department of Public Works(MPW) identified seven corridors in the County that experience heavy traffic congestion and needed traffic signal timing improvements to improve traffic flow as well as air quality and fuel consumption. The seven corridors included a total of 223 signalised intersections. To conduct this study, termed the Traffic Signal Optimisation Study for the Metro Nashville Signal System, MPW received funding from the Federal Conge
    Read More
  • Report: International freight transport to quadruple by 2050
    February 23, 2015
    International Transport Forum’s (ITF) Transport Outlook 2015, presented in January 2015 at the OECD headquarters in Paris, France, examines the development of global transport volumes and related CO2 emissions and health impacts through to 2050. It examines factors that can affect supply and demand for transport services and focuses on scenarios illustrating potential upper and lower pathways, discussing their relevance to policy making. It presents an overview of long-run scenarios for the development of g
    Read More
  • 'Conservatism hampering ITS technical evolution'
    November 13, 2012
    Nick Lanigan, managing director of Clearview Traffic, considers the current outlook in the ITS sector from an SME's perspective. Interview with Jason Barnes. When times are hard, businesses can invest or cut. Either way, they need guidance from customers – governments – on where best to concentrate their efforts. Prolonged economic slowdown is currently an issue. A short recession, however sharp, would have left many industry players able to ride the bow-wave of governments’ multi-year spending on strategic
    Read More
  • Do buses need subsidies in congestion charging areas
    June 20, 2016
    David Crawford takes a look at the debate surrounding bus subsidies. Subsidies for public transport are a well-known and frequently-used policy tool directed at reducing the high environmental and social costs of peak-period traffic congestion. But at the end of last year the Swedish Centre for Transport Studies published a working paper entitled ‘Should buses still be subsidised in Stockholm?’ This concluded that the subsidy levels currently being applied in Stockholm could be nearly halved by setting bus
    Read More

Highlighted Content