Skip to main content

Pride & joy & pushback

Solidarity, celebration – and some disquiet. Support for the LGBTQ+ community among businesses has provoked a variety of responses. Adam Hill looks at the ITS industry’s reaction to Pride month
By Adam Hill June 26, 2023 Read time: 3 mins
© Iurii Kuzo | Dreamstime.com

Parts of the ITS industry have been vocal – particularly on social media - in support of June’s Pride month, the annual celebration of LGBTQ+ life and communities.

Many big-name companies have changed their logos to rainbow colours, or put out supportive posts on LinkedIn, Twitter, Facebook, Instagram and other platforms with hashtags including #ridewithpride.

For example, Cubic Transportation Systems said: “We are proud to foster an inclusive and diverse environment for all. This month, we honour and support the LGBTQ+ community, promoting equality and acceptance. Together, let's create a world where everyone can ride with pride!”

Conduent posted: “We firmly believe an equitable and inclusive workplace - where everyone, regardless of their differences, has an opportunity to thrive and contribute their strengths - is critical to our success.”

Authentic selves

American Public Transportation Association said it supported “the freedom for everyone to be their authentic selves” and a variety of transit agencies have special Pride-liveried trains and buses, including New York City’s Metropolitan Transportation Authority, which featured rainbow hearts on trains and Pride MetroCards at some vending machines.

“The MTA is committed to delivering the message of equality and love in celebration of LGBTQ+ Pride Month to riders and we’re proud to make that heard loud and clear across the metropolitan area,” said MTA acting chief customer officer Shanifah Rieara.

The month is not without controversy, however, with some commentators seeing Pride as politicking or propaganda; in short, not something that companies and organisations should be promoting. As a result, some corporates in the US – Major League Baseball, retailer Target, Nascar and even the US Navy - have experienced some pushback.

When Tier Mobility publicised e-scooters and e-bikes decorated with the rainbow in various European locations, one comment asked why the Pride-themed bikes were not available in Middle Eastern countries. “While we can fly the Pride flag in most countries in Europe, we respect that this is not legal in other countries,” came the measured response.

Public stance

Wayne Ting, CEO of micromobility group Lime was clear about his company’s reasons for being involved. “The backlash this year against companies taking a stand for LGBTQ+ causes is more reason why we at Lime felt the urgency to take a public stance for trans rights and the rights of all LGBTQ+ people,” he posted. “I’m proud to be an openly gay CEO. And more importantly, I’m proud that standing up for equality and justice is core to our mission.”

Other senior ITS figures have also made personal statements about Pride. In a post beginning “Move as you are”, Christian Haas, CEO of PTV Group, wrote: “At PTV and Umovity, our success depends on the talents of employees from countless backgrounds. Diversity enriches our company every day and has therefore always been an integral part of our corporate culture. Therefore, it holds immense significance for us to foster an inclusive workplace across all our global offices, where every individual can feel they belong.” He thanked his team for organising PTV’s first participation and sponsorship in the company’s local Pride festival in Karlsruhe, Germany.

Better ideas

Eyal Cohen, director of global business development at Optibus, said in an online interview: “I don’t think any employee can reach their personal peak if they’re not comfortable in their own skin. By creating an LGBTQ+-friendly workplace, companies can reduce stress and improve the health of LGBTQ+ employees, increase job satisfaction and create more positive relationships with co-workers and supervisors.”

Cohen concludes that it makes business sense too: “A variety of perspectives put a variety of world views into one room, and you'll come out the other side with better ideas.”

Related Content

  • We know that ITS can reduce road deaths - this is a moral issue
    May 8, 2019
    If you live in one of the world’s poor countries you are three times more likely to die in a road accident than if you live in a richer country. This sobering finding comes from the latest World Health Organisation report on road safety (p41). That simply isn’t good enough. As WHO points out, proven solutions are available to improve the chilling statistics. These include better legislation and strong enforcement, of course, but technology must also be part of the mix. This is an economic issue - but it’s
  • Strike action prompts commuters to try something different
    June 2, 2014
    David Crawford highlights responses to transit disruption on both sides of the Atlantic. Shortly before workers at San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) began a lengthy round of pay and conditions-related strikes in summer 2013, impacting on the daily lives of 400,000 communities, online ridesharing group Avego publicised a new web address: bartstrike.com. By the start of the following week, Avego was encouraging stranded commuters to download its smartphone app by offering them the chance in a raffle
  • Managing congestion, better information changes perceptions
    January 31, 2012
    Kapsch's Dietrich Leihs talks about the true fundamentals of urban pricing. In some Italian and German towns and cities, the solution to congestion is an outright ban on certain types of vehicles. As far as Dietrich Leihs is concerned, any attempt to sweeten the pill that is congestion charging is only ever going to be a partial success at best.
  • US transportation policy needs to restart to sort shortcomings
    August 2, 2012
    Joshua Schank has no illusions when it comes to what he and the Bipartisan Policy Center are suggesting in Performance Driven: New Vision for US Transportation Policy. Released in June of this year, this major report (see Sidebar, 'The Shift in Thinking') advocates no less than a root-and-branch overhaul of the way in which the US transportation system is run - how money is allocated and how the beneficiaries of that funding are selected. As its name suggests, Schank and his colleagues are urging senior US