Skip to main content

MaaS Market conference platform for pioneering projects

In opening the session on putting MaaS ideas into practice, Hans Arby, chief executive of UbiGo, told the conference that, “MaaS can mean different things to different people. This is why we decided to run MaaS under real conditions and launch the Gothenburg pilot scheme in 2013.” The trial involved 70 households paying €130/month for 6 months with participants agreeing that 20 cars could be put into storage. More than 12,000 bookings/transactions took place during the trial and there were no drop-outs. Ac
August 21, 2017 Read time: 5 mins
Hans Arby- UbiGo.

One session of 1846 ITS International’s 8545 MaaS Market conference was dedicated to case studies of fledgling MaaS schemes. Geoff Hadwick listened in.

In opening the session on putting MaaS ideas into practice, Hans Arby, chief executive of UbiGo, told the conference that, “MaaS can mean different things to different people. This is why we decided to run MaaS under real conditions and launch the Gothenburg pilot scheme in 2013.”

The trial involved 70 households paying €130/month for 6 months with participants agreeing that 20 cars could be put into storage. More than 12,000 bookings/transactions took place during the trial and there were no drop-outs.

According to Arby, convenience was seen as the main benefit and the “reason that people wanted to carry on”. Money and the environment were important but it was the convenience of MaaS that people liked, he said, adding: “What we really need is government support for third-party on-selling of public transport tickets,”

He sees the way forward, which includes further planned trials in Stockholm, as a staged process with the law-makers.

Right now, we are on the bottom rung with “no integration and single, separate services,” he said. The next step is the “integration of information via multimodal travel planners and better pricing info.” After that, the market should look at “integration,” of both the “payment process and the contractual” side of things where operators are going to need to “bundle” their services and offer subscriptions. Finally, Arby hopes that the market can get to a position where there is proper “policy integration, good governance” and a high level of public/private co-operation enabled by the right sort of legislation.

Arby’s co-speaker, Adam Laurell, a consultant with Samtrafiken, sees this shared responsibility as essential. The market needs a common vision in government and on the ground, he said. We are all about “re-defining public transport. In the future, public transport has to equal passenger transport services using shared resources.”

Samtrafiken, a consortium of 37 investor-owners from the public and the private sector, is set to lead a trail in Sweden aimed at “establishing a national integration platform.”

According to Laurell, “the aim is to enable and promote combined mobility services on a large scale, and third party sales in general by making PTA services available via a national access point.” The trial will “ensure a common regulatory framework. The starting point will be PTA services in Gothenburg area (Västtrafik) during 2017/2018, followed by schemes in Stockholm and Malmö in 2018/2019.”

“We want to see new combined mobility services and sales channels emerge in Sweden,” he says, and “we are searching for a technical supplier/partner for a national integration platform starting now.” The vision is to “enable the emergence of simple, sustainable and profitable combined mobility services.”

Laurell said there are still too many single occupancy vehicles and fellow panellists Michael Kieslinger, managing partner of Fluidtime Data Services and Martin Russ, managing director of 4793 AustriaTech both agreed. We need “reduced car ownership” levels and a “strengthening of public transport” to bring about a digitally-delivered MaaS market, added Russ.

“We need to change value perspectives and address people’s emotions if we are ever going to compete with the privately-owned car. And we have to put the user at the centre of it all.”

Russ has a road-map to the future which links together policy, data, business and impact (see image).

Kieslinger has a vision too. “Keep it simple,” he told the conference. “Be like 1691 Google. Show users their top four choices and their first mile and last mile options. Make it a seamless experience.”

He is working on an Austrian research project to establish an integrated mobility platform involving Austria’s two largest mobility providers - Wiener Stadtwerke and Austrian Federal Railways (ÖBB). The scheme has “15 integrated transport service providers and was initially conceived under the project Smile which ran until May 2015. 

The project created a ‘Fluid Hub’ to enable cities and regions to set-up an ecosystem and open their markets for integrated mobility and MaaS deployments. “The platform links traveller demand to mobility offerings, providing them with efficient, affordable, accessible and green mobility options,” said Kieslinger.

Project objectives include socially inclusive and affordable access to mobility, fostering environmentally friendly mobility, supporting local transport offerings, managing traffic across modalities and introducing on-demand first/last mile services with reducing operational costs. This is designed to secure the transport offering in a fast-changing mobility landscape; provide integrated and seamless configurable mobility; create customer-centred offerings; create new or value-added business and profit from valuable reseller-agreements.

Ask yourself some difficult questions before you embark on a MaaS market project, Kieslinger advised the conference delegates. “Do you want to sell each other’s services? Do you want others to sell your services?”

Don’t get involved if you have not asked yourself “what is your favourite strategic/policy option? Are you open to data and API de- or re-regulation? What is your perspective on innovation? Do you have or want an open business environment?”

And, most importantly of all, know who you are dealing with … “Do you think you know enough about your customers,” Kieslinger asked?

Maybe setting up a MaaS scheme, and analysing the data it generates, will be the only reliable way to answer that one.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Call for a new vision for ITS in America
    February 1, 2012
    An ITIF report published at the beginning of this year stated that America is falling behind other developed nations in terms of ITS technologies and their deployment to address safety, congestion and environmental challenges. The report asked for a stronger commitment from the US federal government (see 'Just crawling along', interview with senior ITIF analyst Stephen Ezell, ITS International March-April 2010, pp.NA1-NA2) in order to address what it sees as increasing disparities with other countries. The
  • Call for a new vision for ITS in America
    February 6, 2012
    Pete Goldin talks to Dr. Joseph Sussman, Chairman of the ITS Program Advisory Committee, about the state of intelligent transport systems in America
  • Electronic toll collection delivers efficient traffic regulation
    February 3, 2012
    Electronic tolling systems have been in use for decades now. Worldwide, steadily more and more tolling systems are being set into operation, providing efficient means for traffic regulation and financing of infrastructure. But despite this maturity enforcement is still not being given the consideration it deserves. Q-Free's Steinar Furan writes
  • 'Conservatism hampering ITS technical evolution'
    November 13, 2012
    Nick Lanigan, managing director of Clearview Traffic, considers the current outlook in the ITS sector from an SME's perspective. Interview with Jason Barnes. When times are hard, businesses can invest or cut. Either way, they need guidance from customers – governments – on where best to concentrate their efforts. Prolonged economic slowdown is currently an issue. A short recession, however sharp, would have left many industry players able to ride the bow-wave of governments’ multi-year spending on strategic