Data sharing between organisations remains a potential problem for Mobility as a Service projects, attendees at February's MaaS Market conference in London were told. Alan Dron listens in on the presentations.    
 
     
Several speakers noted that MaaS faced teething problems because of a lack of data passing between organisations, after Wood asked for industry input on whether the European Commission should step in.
     
She said that while more and more data was available, she wanted to know whether a new layer of data should be created to link the various parties and create a more integrated system.
     
She asked whether such a layer already existed. If it didn’t, did it need to be created and, if so, was that something in which the European Commission should have a hand together with national governments, or should it be left to individual stakeholders? 
     
“A layer of transport data would be an enabler [for MaaS]. Personally I don’t believe we’re going to get there if we don’t have it. The question is ‘Who needs to do it, and what?’” She said that while most of the technology solutions for MaaS were pretty much ready and many organisations could also make a financial case for it, some dominant transport operators did not see that it was in their interests to share data in a multimodal transport layer. 
 
Wood added that she has a steady stream of people coming to her and urging her to either regulate, or deregulate, MaaS.
     
“Whether  we regulate less, or do more, what we need to do is find new ways of  acting together, both from the side of the EC, the member states and the  stakeholders. We need to bring the actors together. I promise that the  EC will facilitate and bring the actors together, if that is something  you want and will help you to go forward.
     
“The backbone of everything that should be done is co-operation. Do come to me if something needs to be done.”
     
In  a later Q&A session, however, she agreed with a questioner that so  far “There’s been a great silence when it comes to suggesting things we  should do, or change”.
     
Opening  the event, BBC transport cor- respondent and the conference moderator  Nick Higham, told his audience that: “The challenge for you and others  in the industry is to find a way to make MaaS appealing.”
     
Higham,  who noted that, having given up his car in favour of a shared-car  scheme in the past year, he had become an early adopter (“for the first  time in my life, at the age of 63”), added that MaaS had a potentially  invaluable jumping-off point, in that the current young generation was  perhaps the first in history that did not see owning a car as a status  symbol.
     
However, there  were some groups – such as parents with young children – who would still  “think very carefully indeed” about ditching their own cars. Several  speak- ers spoke of the difficulty of manoeuvring buggies on to shared  forms of transport.
     
Higham  said that MaaS was now moving out of the technology phase to one where  issues of governance were receiving more attention. These covered facets  such as how to assign revenue streams among shared modes of transport  and whether companies would be prepared to share their data with rivals.  “And if autonomous vehicles do become part of the landscape, where does  that leave traditional car companies?”
 
The need for co-operation        
         
Two panel discussions towards the end of day two of the MaaS Market conference in London threw up some lively thoughts on some of the most diffcult issues fac- ing the ITS industry, writes Adam Hill.
         
There was a strong feeling among delegates that government help was going to be required. Nathan Marsh, UK and northern Europe director for intelligent mobility at Atkins, said: “We’d welcome guidance, counsel, challenge, co-funding – government can create the conditions for MaaS to succeed.” Daniel Clarke, digital programme manager at Smart Cambridge, agreed: “Collaboration is key – central government has a role in helping, potentially through legislation.” Pedro Mourisca, CEO of Via Verde, explained that the impetus for his company’s multimodal solutions in Lisbon, Portugal, came in part from the need to comply with environmental legislation. Authorities know that they need options – including private sector ones - because they cannot do everything for themselves. “The endeavour is so large that they welcome all kinds of initiatives, ”Mourisca said. But even if the desire is there, a gap often remains between hope and execution.
         
 ITS warning        
Sounding a warning for the UK market, Richard Harris, director Europe for 
         
On the subject of restricting indi- vidual car ownership, Anton Fitzthum, business development manager at 
         
Eduardo Costa Ramos, CEO of 
 
OEM diversification
One speaker, Lars Klawitter, executive director of strategic business at InMotion Ventures, suggested during the conference that car manufacturers may have to think about diversifying. “OEMs will have to think where they position themselves on this continuum.” Klawitter is currently leading the development of proprietary mobility services and their integration into     
During     a panel discussion, Chris Perry, UK lead, MaaS Global, said that   among   early adopters of MaaS generally were young city dwellers who   were   already finding that operating their own car in an urban   environment was   “a bit of a pain”.    Chris Perry, UK lead, MaaS   Global, com-         
     
Also     likely to be among those taking advantage of MaaS schemes were  ‘empty    nesters’ with a certain level of disposable income, who  understood  that   buying such a ‘mobility package’ could have a  beneficial effect  on  their  lives.
     
He  added   that some  operators in the current transport eco-system feared  they  had  something  to lose from MaaS: “My feeling is that they are  already   feeling some  disruption and if they don’t join in the  disruption, they   are probably  going to lose anyway.”
     
Another     panel discussion saw Dr Maria Kamargianni, lecturer in transport and     energy at University College London, note that the UK capital  already    had many of the factors that would make it an ideal MaaS  subject: many    residents did not like driving in the city, and an  extensive public    transport and bike-sharing system was already in  place. What was needed    was an integrated app to tie various factors  together.
     
Suzanne     Hoadley, senior manager at Polis Network, a grouping of European    cities  and regions co-operating for innovative transport solutions,    said that a  recent survey had found that there was limited knowledge    of, and some  indifference to, MaaS systems within local authorities,    which were  worried they could lose influence over their transport    function.  Ultimately, said Kamargianni, “People don’t care who provides    MaaS, they  just want to go from A to B and have a service they can    trust.” 
The MaaS Market conference brought news of the successful launch of a MaaS system in Helsinki.
Beta launch
Chris Perry, UK lead, MaaS Global, and director, International Mobility Solutions, said that a beta launch of Whim in 2016 saw initial customers reduce the level of private car use from 40% of that sample’s trips to 20%, with the majority of those journeys moving towards public transport. “Yes, the number of taxi trips increased, but not massively, from once a month to typi- cally around once a week.” Overall, average spending on public transport went up from €31 a month to €125, “but people were prepared to spend that”.
Monthly subscription
Whim operates on a monthly subscription basis, with most subscribers choosing the €49 Whim Urban option. This is aimed at regular passengers who need the flexibility of using an occasional taxi or car as well as public transport. It gives a €10 guaranteed taxi ride within a 5km radius, so passengers can travel within the Helsinki urban area or get to the Espoo metro. It also offers fixed-price car hire for €49 a month.
Initial experience encouraged MaaS Global to introduce what Perry described as a revolutionary product, whereby subscribers paid €499 a month for unlimited travel. This compared favourably to the average monthly cost of owning a car in Helsinki, which was calculated at €503. The higher level subscription gives users un- limited public transport use, an unlimited amount of taxi rides within a 5km radius, access to a Metro extension line in Espoo plus access to a compact car for every day that they require one. Car-sharing will be included later this year.
Although the Whim Urban is by far the more popular option, a number of the €499 packages have also been sold, said Perry.
Any unspent money in a subscriber’s account at month’s-end is forfeited; this has led to an unintended consequence of people going out towards the end of the month and spending it (and thus making more journeys than they might have done otherwise) rather than losing the money. A Whim project is due to go live in the UK’s West Midlands region later this year.
    
        
        
        
        



