ITS South Africa sees a perfect storm as spending is squeezed

The argument for cost-benefit analysis of ITS has never been so strong, according to Dr Paul Vorster, CEO of ITS South Africa, as the industry finds itself “in the eye of a perfect storm. There are escalating demands for solutions to strategic challenges such as cutting congestion, and improving and expanding mobility by moving people out of private vehicles and into public and non-motorised transport.
August 10, 2016 Read time: 2 mins
Dr Paul Vorster

The argument for cost-benefit analysis of ITS has never been so strong, according to Dr Paul Vorster, CEO of 6992 ITS South Africa, as the industry finds itself “in the eye of a perfect storm. There are escalating demands for solutions to strategic challenges such as cutting congestion, and improving and expanding mobility by moving people out of private vehicles and into public and non-motorised transport. 

“At the same time, budgets are constrained and both transport authorities and operators are under pressure to cut back on capital investment, reduce their running costs and maximise the benefits of money spent”. Behind these constraints, “some very powerful forces are combining to effect strong leverage on ITS deployment”, said Vorster - a management committee member of 8359 IBEC (the International Benefits Evaluation Community).

“South Africa,” he told ITS International, “is experiencing such a perfect storm to a magnified degree. So are many other countries with emerging economies that are facing rapid urbanisation and insufficient infrastructure to meet demands for mobility.”

At a May 2016 ITS South Africa workshop on the issue, delegates heard that exotic ‘bespoke’ solutions can significantly increase the costs of designing, building, maintaining and operating an ITS solution. Instead, the focus should be on what is needed, rather than wanted, and on delivering a core system that is fit for purpose and delivers optimum benefits.
In the specific area of bus rapid transit (BRT) systems – in which South Africa, like other countries, is currently investing heavily – stringent reviews of early implementations in Johannesburg and Cape Town have highlighted the need to modify design specifications to achieve an improved cost-benefit ratio.

IBEC’s mission, Dr Vorster concluded, is to encourage the growth of an international community of cost-benefit proponents to support the ITS industry.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • IBTTA summit hits right notes in Salzburg
    December 5, 2018
    In the birthplace of Mozart, Colin Sowman found that delegates at the IBTTA’s inaugural World Tolling Summit were playing a variety of interesting tunes The first World Tolling Summit took place in Salzburg, Austria this autumn. Created and organised by the International Bridge Tolling and Turnpike Association (IBTTA), the event was supported by its European counterpart Asecap and hosted by Austria’s tolling authority, Asfinag. The transfer of views, experience and practice both ways across the Atl
    Read More
  • ITS America appoints new technical editor
    April 24, 2013
    ITS America has chosen Dr John Miles as technical editor for a new web-based resource on ITS. With funding from the US Department of Transportation (USDOT), the society plans to publish in mid-2014 in partnership with the World Road Association (PIARC) on the latter’s website.
    Read More
  • Counting the environmental costs of ITS deployment
    October 29, 2015
    David Crawford looks at the latest thinking about calculating the benefits associated with the environmental side of ITS schemes. The penny is dropping that some environmental costs “are being shifted outside the traditional bounds of evaluation methods” for ITS-based road transport projects, according to researchers at the UK University of Leeds’ Institute for Transport Studies.
    Read More
  • ITS advancement lays beyond benefit-cost analysis
    May 29, 2013
    Shelley Row, former Director of the US Department of Transportation’s ITS Joint Program Office, gives her views on the way forward for the industry. We, as intelligent transportation system (ITS) proponents and engineers, tend to be overly fixated on benefit-cost data. We want decisions to be made on logical grounds for which benefit-cost calculations are optimal. While benefit-cost data is necessary, it is not always sufficient. We can learn from our history where we see three broad groups of ITS deploymen
    Read More

Highlighted Content