Skip to main content

ITS America: V2X needs adequate spectrum

Laura Chace explains why ITS America is back in court to fight for connected vehicle technologies – and outlines efforts to lay the foundation for moving V2X forward with whatever spectrum is available
By Laura Chace March 1, 2022 Read time: 4 mins
ITS America has been advocating for the retention of adequate spectrum for the range of V2X message types, explaining the importance of sufficient interference limits (© Beror | Dreamstime.com)

In January, the US National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) released a series of videos called V2X – Preserving the Future of Connected Vehicle Technology, hosted by NTSB member Michael Graham. I was pleased to participate in the second episode, Impact of FCC Actions and Global Advancements.

The week after the series was released, ITS America and the American Association of State Highway Transportation Officials (AASHTO) presented oral arguments to the DC Circuit Court, appealing the Federal Communications Commission (FCC)’s order reallocating the majority of the spectrum in the 5.9 GHz band for use by unlicensed devices.

While there is no magic bullet to reduce crashes and fatalities, we have a responsibility to use all the tools at our disposal to save lives. The best tool we currently have is connected vehicle technologies – but without wide-scale deployment, we can’t hope to move the needle on reducing traffic fatalities.

ITS America is pursuing several strategies in addition to our legal case to preserve the viability of Vehicle to Everything (V2X) communications. First, we have been working within the FCC’s rule-making process, advocating for the retention of adequate spectrum for the range of V2X message types, explaining the importance of sufficient interference limits, and arguing in favour of a reimbursement mechanism for stranded V2X deployments.

If the FCC continues to move forward with reallocation, we have also called on the Commission to work with the Department of Commerce (DOC) and the Department of Transportation (USDoT) to identify suitable additional spectrum for V2X deployment.

We have demonstrated that the full range of V2X applications - including sensor sharing and cooperative manoeuvring, which are important for enhancing automated vehicle (AV) safety, and vulnerable road user safety applications - would be unable to fit within a 30 MHz spectrum environment.

To fully use the tools that will be lost due to this spectrum reallocation, an additional 40 MHz of low-latency, mid-band spectrum is required. These spectrum attributes are essential for allowing the instantaneous, reliable message transmission that is required to avert crashes and coordinate vehicle actions at high speeds.

In addition, we have worked with a wide-ranging coalition of V2X stakeholders representing state, city, and county departments of transportation, public transportation, automakers, vehicle suppliers, trucking, transportation safety groups, law enforcement, first responders, vulnerable road users, and other interested groups – this coalition has continued to ask the US Congress to intervene and offer appropriate protections for V2X technologies.

ITS America’s Future of V2X Working Group is also evaluating how best to deploy V2X technologies in a limited 30 MHz spectrum environment. This group released a preliminary 30 MHz Application Map in 2021, which shows what message types and applications might be supported despite the FCC’s actions reallocating spectrum.  

Currently, we are undertaking research to further evaluate deploying V2X in 30 MHz of spectrum and will soon release a 30 MHz survey, seeking input from across the transportation industry to inform our next version of the Application Map. These efforts are laying the foundation for moving V2X forward with whatever spectrum is available.

Our focus remains on trying to ensure whatever spectrum is available for V2X is usable and protected from interference, seeking to preserve the full 75 MHz through our appeal, and asking the FCC to work with DOC and USDoT to identify additional spectrum elsewhere so that we can realise the full benefits of V2X technologies.

Laura Chace
Laura Chace

The fight for V2X technologies is intensely personal to me; I have teenage boys who are about to get their driving permits. They ride their bicycles to school every day, and I worry about their safety every day. People in communities across the country should be able to safely walk, bike and drive in their neighbourhoods and on our roadways. We urge USDoT, NTSB, DOC, and others to continue to discuss the importance of V2X to transportation safety and to work with the transportation industry to determine how best to deploy V2X services in the available spectrum.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR:
Laura Chace is CEO of ITS America

Related Content

  • November 30, 2020
    Transport can build legacy of hope
    Racial and social injustice has come to the fore this year. Samuel Johnson, IBTTA president and Transportation Corridor Agencies CEO, explains what the industry can do to build ‘a legacy of hope and progress’
  • August 19, 2014
    Big data bonus for Dublin’s buses
    Dublin’s smart research partnership speeds buses More than 50% of people travelling into and across the Irish capital rely on public transport, and four out of 10 these use buses meaning Dublin Bus carries some 120 million passengers a year.
  • February 1, 2012
    Advanced in-vehicle user interface - future developments
    Dave McNamara and Craig Simonds, Autotechinsider LLC, look at human-machine interface development out to 2015. The US auto industry is going through the worst crisis it has faced since the Great Depression. But it has embraced technologies that will produce the best-possible driving experience for the public. Ford was the first OEM to announce in-car internet radio and SYNC, its signature-branded User Interface (UI), is held up as the shining example of change embracement.
  • May 28, 2020
    Parsons: three things ITS professionals can do about Covid-19
    There is a way out of this: it is possible to address the impacts of coronavirus on our transportation networks, suggest Andrew Liu and Daniel Lukasik of Parsons