Skip to main content

Heading the right way with Caltrans

Wrong-way collisions are relatively rare – but they are often head-on and fatal. After recent studies, California DoT is reviewing its highway design standards
By David Arminas October 27, 2020 Read time: 3 mins
© Caltrans

Some ways of deterring and detecting wrong-way driving are better than others. Recent pilot programmes by California’s Department of Transportation (Caltrans) and a university research centre highlight two effective measures that have been taken on board by the US state.

The pilot was developed following 10 wrong-way driver-related collisions on freeways around the cities of Sacramento and San Diego in the first six months of 2015.

Caltrans engaged the University of California, Davis’s Advanced Highway Maintenance and Construction Technology (AHMCT) Research Center to gather data on these rare, but often deadly, collisions.

One of the prevention measures included in the three-year pilot programme was reflectors that alert drivers entering the roadway in the wrong direction.

In the city of San Diego, the number of wrong-way drivers decreased by 44% after reflectors were installed.

“Adding the two-way reflective markers proved to be so effective that Caltrans updated its state-wide design standards,” said Toks Omishakin, Caltrans director. On this basis the reflective markers have been installed on hundreds of miles of highways.

During the study, Caltrans installed and tested different ways to deter wrong-way drivers along exit ramps in San Diego as well as Sacramento.

Among the systems were two-way reflective pavement markers that show white or yellow to right-way drivers and red to wrong-way drivers. Also, “Wrong Way” signs were placed at the off-ramp.

Meanwhile, “Do Not Enter” signs were equipped with LED lights flashing 24 hours a day.

Active monitoring systems that use radar to detect wrong-way drivers were set up. The systems activate a secondary set of LED signs when a wrong-way driver enters the ramp. It sends real-time alerts and photos to Caltrans and the California Highway Patrol.

Caltrans monitored the exit ramps throughout the pilot and learned the two-way reflective pavement markers were an effective measure against wrong-way drivers. The department is installing them as it performs maintenance or repaving.

The flashing LED signs showed promise at preventing wrong-way collisions. Caltrans said it will continue to monitor their impact to determine whether to expand use at exit ramps across the state.

Driving behaviour

During the pilot programme, UC Davis AHMCT researchers conducted a second study using a vision-based site monitoring (VBSM) system in Sacramento to better understand the actions that lead to wrong-way driving incidents.

“Our hypothesis was that some of the causes of wrong-way driving start before a driver enters the ramp,” said Ty Lasky, a researcher and AHMCT co-director, who helped lead the study. “In order to test this, we wanted to extend our field of view to capture as much of the roadway around the exit ramp as possible.”

The VBSM system consisted of a camera, analytical software, solar panels and a modem mounted on poles near exit ramps. The system recorded video when the camera detected a wrong-way driver. This allowed the team to study a vehicle’s path before, during and after an incident.

“The video gave us a more comprehensive understanding of driver behaviour and factors that contribute to wrong-way driving,” said Bahram Ravani, UC Davis Distinguished Professor and AHMCT co-director. “This opens the door for further deployment of our system across the state.”

Wrong-way collisions on divided highways in California account for about 1% of all crashes on state highways. However, on average, 37 people are killed in wrong-way collisions each year. Most of these incidents are caused by severely impaired drivers and occur in the left-hand lane for vehicles travelling in the correct direction.

“Seeing someone driving in the wrong direction is a scary sight and a clear danger to other road users,” said Barbara Rooney, director at the Office of Traffic Safety, a state agency that annually funds over $80 million in innovative, evidence-based education, enforcement programmes and technologies to make California’s roadways safer. “Maintaining safe driving behaviour is critical in preventing crashes that have tragic consequences.”

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Gearing up for IntelliDrive cooperative traffic management
    February 1, 2012
    Beginning in the first quarter of 2010 it became evident that the IntelliDrivesm programme direction had been reestablished, by the USDOT's ITS Joint Program Office (JPO), after being adrift for a few years. The programme was now moving toward a deployment future and with a much broader stakeholder involvement than it had exhibited previously. By today not only is it evident that the programme was reestablished with a renewed emphasis on deployment, it is also apparent that it is moving along at a faster pa
  • More Than: over half of Britons in test support car crash images used as speeding deterrent
    November 20, 2017
    58% of Britons who took part in a More Than (MT) visual deterrent speed sign test support its new proposal for speed limit signs to be accompanied by images of car crashes to deter drivers from speeding. The test follows a recent study from the campaign group, which revealed that 62% of drivers regularly ignore speeding signs along with 25% who stated that the threat of having to attend a speed awareness course isn't enough of a deterrent. Upon the reasons behind the effectiveness of the images in causing
  • When traffic data can get it totally wrong
    November 30, 2021
    How can a highway devoid of traffic provide data suggesting it is filled with vehicles crawling along? Michael Vardi of Valerann provides an insight into how data can easily be skewed - and what can be done to prevent it
  • Should it be end of the road for right-turns on red?
    April 10, 2024
    Banning right-hand turns after stopping for a red light is gaining momentum in the US. But the debate continues about whether it will result in fewer incidents between vehicles and alternative mobility users. David Arminas reports