Skip to main content

Heading the right way with Caltrans

Wrong-way collisions are relatively rare – but they are often head-on and fatal. After recent studies, California DoT is reviewing its highway design standards
By David Arminas October 27, 2020 Read time: 3 mins
© Caltrans

Some ways of deterring and detecting wrong-way driving are better than others. Recent pilot programmes by California’s Department of Transportation (Caltrans) and a university research centre highlight two effective measures that have been taken on board by the US state.

The pilot was developed following 10 wrong-way driver-related collisions on freeways around the cities of Sacramento and San Diego in the first six months of 2015.

Caltrans engaged the University of California, Davis’s Advanced Highway Maintenance and Construction Technology (AHMCT) Research Center to gather data on these rare, but often deadly, collisions.

One of the prevention measures included in the three-year pilot programme was reflectors that alert drivers entering the roadway in the wrong direction.

In the city of San Diego, the number of wrong-way drivers decreased by 44% after reflectors were installed.

“Adding the two-way reflective markers proved to be so effective that Caltrans updated its state-wide design standards,” said Toks Omishakin, Caltrans director. On this basis the reflective markers have been installed on hundreds of miles of highways.

During the study, Caltrans installed and tested different ways to deter wrong-way drivers along exit ramps in San Diego as well as Sacramento.

Among the systems were two-way reflective pavement markers that show white or yellow to right-way drivers and red to wrong-way drivers. Also, “Wrong Way” signs were placed at the off-ramp.

Meanwhile, “Do Not Enter” signs were equipped with LED lights flashing 24 hours a day.

Active monitoring systems that use radar to detect wrong-way drivers were set up. The systems activate a secondary set of LED signs when a wrong-way driver enters the ramp. It sends real-time alerts and photos to Caltrans and the California Highway Patrol.

Caltrans monitored the exit ramps throughout the pilot and learned the two-way reflective pavement markers were an effective measure against wrong-way drivers. The department is installing them as it performs maintenance or repaving.

The flashing LED signs showed promise at preventing wrong-way collisions. Caltrans said it will continue to monitor their impact to determine whether to expand use at exit ramps across the state.

Driving behaviour

During the pilot programme, UC Davis AHMCT researchers conducted a second study using a vision-based site monitoring (VBSM) system in Sacramento to better understand the actions that lead to wrong-way driving incidents.

“Our hypothesis was that some of the causes of wrong-way driving start before a driver enters the ramp,” said Ty Lasky, a researcher and AHMCT co-director, who helped lead the study. “In order to test this, we wanted to extend our field of view to capture as much of the roadway around the exit ramp as possible.”

The VBSM system consisted of a camera, analytical software, solar panels and a modem mounted on poles near exit ramps. The system recorded video when the camera detected a wrong-way driver. This allowed the team to study a vehicle’s path before, during and after an incident.

“The video gave us a more comprehensive understanding of driver behaviour and factors that contribute to wrong-way driving,” said Bahram Ravani, UC Davis Distinguished Professor and AHMCT co-director. “This opens the door for further deployment of our system across the state.”

Wrong-way collisions on divided highways in California account for about 1% of all crashes on state highways. However, on average, 37 people are killed in wrong-way collisions each year. Most of these incidents are caused by severely impaired drivers and occur in the left-hand lane for vehicles travelling in the correct direction.

“Seeing someone driving in the wrong direction is a scary sight and a clear danger to other road users,” said Barbara Rooney, director at the Office of Traffic Safety, a state agency that annually funds over $80 million in innovative, evidence-based education, enforcement programmes and technologies to make California’s roadways safer. “Maintaining safe driving behaviour is critical in preventing crashes that have tragic consequences.”

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Building the case for photo enforcement
    October 26, 2016
    As red light enforcement is returning to some intersections and being shut down at others, new evidence has been released backing the safety campaigners, reports Jon Masters. In 2014, 709 Americans were killed in red-light-running crashes and an estimated 126,000 were injured according to the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS).
  • Road safety systems on show at ITS World Congress
    January 30, 2012
    A vast array of new products and systems for aiding road safety were displayed at the ITS World Congress in October. David Crawford assesses a selection of safety initiatives exhibited in Orlando. Vital roles for ITS applications in road traffic safety emerge clearly from a new report from the US Transportation Safety Advancement Group. The report has been carried out for the Next Generation 911 What's Next Forum, which is preparing the way for future development of the US national 911 emergency single call
  • Innovation in progress: DriveOhio takes the lead in ITS
    October 8, 2020
    Ohio has many entities involved in autonomous and connected technologies, and DriveOhio, the centre for smart mobility, brings them under one umbrella. Projects across the state are driving its preparation and leadership for the future of mobility, and Bosch is a key partner.
  • New solutions for catching texting drivers
    October 28, 2016
    Many countries have laws prohibiting texting while driving but enforcement is proving difficult – David Crawford looks at some new approaches being tried by authorities. Finding definitive solutions – technological, regulatory and educational - to the potentially lethal practice of people driving while using mobile phones is proving elusive, while the stakes grow higher.