Skip to main content

Congestion charge: Big Changes in the Big Apple

New York City is falling in line with other major global cities in charging drivers for using its streets, writes Adam Hill: the Central Business District Tolling Program is on its way. Probably
By Adam Hill July 11, 2023 Read time: 4 mins
© Ryan Deberardinis | Dreamstime.com

Congestion charging is coming to New York City. The Central Business District Tolling Program means taking your car into Lower Manhattan is not going to be free anymore: if you’re travelling anywhere south of 60th Street (with a few exceptions for through traffic) you will be charged as much as $23 per day. Actually, it’s not happening yet – but a crucial step has been passed.

In May, the Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA), New York State Department of Transportation and New York City Department of Transportation released the Final Environmental Assessment for the plan and a draft 'Finding of No Significant Impact', prepared by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA).

While there may be yawns at this news from other cities round the world, which have had such plans in place for years now, it is a significant move: this would be the first city in the US to take the plunge on congestion charging.

Toll rates

There are still some hoops to jump through: during a process to design, build, test and activate tolling equipment, a six-member Traffic Mobility Review Board (TMRB) is set to develop recommended toll rates along with any potential discounts, crossing credits and/or exemptions. The TMRB recommendation will be presented to the MTA Board acting in its legal capacity as the board of the Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority, the MTA agency that would collect the tolls. Following the filing and publication of a proposed tolling structure and a public comment period, the MTA pledges to hold a public hearing before any tolling structure is adopted. The FHWA will make the final decision.

It all points to a process that was mandated by the state in 2019 becoming a reality in the Big Apple sometime in 2024 – probably.

Public transit

Raising funds to invest in public transit – and cutting emissions and congestion – lies at the heart of the scheme. "This is about more than reducing traffic,” insists New York City mayor Eric Adams. “We'll invest in our transit system and clean up the air in the most polluted communities. Building a stronger future means ensuring progress includes everyone, and we don't push consequences into overlooked communities. This plan will serve all New Yorkers and won't leave anyone behind."

Equity is a key focus, with the MTA and two departments of transportation committing $207.5 million over five years for mitigation measures largely focused on ‘environmental justice communities and populations’. This includes $47.5 million set aside for a new low-income discount and $5 million for additional monitoring of traffic, air quality, and transit station elements.

Unsurprisingly, there are a number of other pressing claims for the money which has yet to be raised: for example, truck and bus electrification.

For Elizabeth Adams, Transportation Alternatives deputy executive director for public affairs: “Congestion pricing is a win for everyone — regardless of if you walk, bike, take transit, or even drive into the Central Business District.”

She paints a primarily green picture of the future. “With the go-ahead from the federal government, it's time for New York State to implement congestion pricing without delay and take steps today to permanently reclaim that space from cars. Without so much congestion of our street space, we can build streets that truly serve the people of New York City — with more green space, better transit, and cleaner air."

Congestion pricing

Riders Alliance executive director Betsy Plum sees this as the green light for subway signal upgrades, new rolling stock and station improvements such as elevators. “Congestion pricing will also cut the gridlock that wastes an estimated $20 billion annually that families absorb in more expensive goods and services and that slows our buses down to a crawl,” she adds.

And the fact that there have been bumps along the way is not lost on Plum, who concludes: “After years of delays, which transit riders are all too familiar with, the federal government has at last decided that millions of New Yorkers, commuters, and visitors to our city can have nice things after all.”

Related Content

  • Telvent relocates and takes a global stance on ITS
    March 12, 2012
    Telvent's Manuel Sanchez Ortega, on relocating the company's headquarters to the US and how that fits in the international scheme of things. The change-of-address cards are in the post; Manuel Sanchez Ortega has just moved homes. The domestic upheaval of Telvent's Chairman and Chief Executive comes as a result of the decision to relocate many of the company's headquarter functions from Madrid to Rockville, Maryland in the US. Viewed in the context of its significant recent acquisitions in North America - am
  • Florida’s Altamonte Springs uses Uber pilot program with Uber to expand transportation coverage
    April 5, 2017
    To Uber or Not to Uber, that is the question cities must answer as they consider the pros and cons of inviting private transportation service providers to fill transportation gaps. Back in 1999, Frank Martz, city manager of Altamonte Springs, Florida, had an idea to expand transportation services to areas not covered by the local bus company.
  • Milwaukee’s bus service offers jobs lifeline
    November 23, 2018
    A bus-to-jobs project in Milwaukee provides a useful service for low-paid workers. A new report shows the economic impact of potential closure on local employers - and demonstrates the importance of public transit networks for disadvantaged communities The city of Milwaukee, Wisconsin, has a problem. Getting people into out-of-town districts for work is an engine of economic growth, but it costs money. The Milwaukee County Transit System (MCTS) bus routes 6 and 61 - also known as JobLines - provide acces
  • ODOT plans ‘smarter highway’
    May 2, 2013
    Until they can raise the US$1 billion it would take to expand congestion-plagued Oregon 217, state traffic planners say they'll focus on making it a smarter highway. Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) engineers believe that a US$6.5 million artificial traffic intelligence project planned for the 217 corridor will permanently alter the Portland metro area's daily commuting culture. The interconnected system will rely on new underground sensors and advanced computer algorithms. The federal government