Skip to main content

Congestion charge: Big Changes in the Big Apple

New York City is falling in line with other major global cities in charging drivers for using its streets, writes Adam Hill: the Central Business District Tolling Program is on its way. Probably
By Adam Hill July 11, 2023 Read time: 4 mins
© Ryan Deberardinis | Dreamstime.com

Congestion charging is coming to New York City. The Central Business District Tolling Program means taking your car into Lower Manhattan is not going to be free anymore: if you’re travelling anywhere south of 60th Street (with a few exceptions for through traffic) you will be charged as much as $23 per day. Actually, it’s not happening yet – but a crucial step has been passed.

In May, the Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA), New York State Department of Transportation and New York City Department of Transportation released the Final Environmental Assessment for the plan and a draft 'Finding of No Significant Impact', prepared by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA).

While there may be yawns at this news from other cities round the world, which have had such plans in place for years now, it is a significant move: this would be the first city in the US to take the plunge on congestion charging.

Toll rates

There are still some hoops to jump through: during a process to design, build, test and activate tolling equipment, a six-member Traffic Mobility Review Board (TMRB) is set to develop recommended toll rates along with any potential discounts, crossing credits and/or exemptions. The TMRB recommendation will be presented to the MTA Board acting in its legal capacity as the board of the Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority, the MTA agency that would collect the tolls. Following the filing and publication of a proposed tolling structure and a public comment period, the MTA pledges to hold a public hearing before any tolling structure is adopted. The FHWA will make the final decision.

It all points to a process that was mandated by the state in 2019 becoming a reality in the Big Apple sometime in 2024 – probably.

Public transit

Raising funds to invest in public transit – and cutting emissions and congestion – lies at the heart of the scheme. "This is about more than reducing traffic,” insists New York City mayor Eric Adams. “We'll invest in our transit system and clean up the air in the most polluted communities. Building a stronger future means ensuring progress includes everyone, and we don't push consequences into overlooked communities. This plan will serve all New Yorkers and won't leave anyone behind."

Equity is a key focus, with the MTA and two departments of transportation committing $207.5 million over five years for mitigation measures largely focused on ‘environmental justice communities and populations’. This includes $47.5 million set aside for a new low-income discount and $5 million for additional monitoring of traffic, air quality, and transit station elements.

Unsurprisingly, there are a number of other pressing claims for the money which has yet to be raised: for example, truck and bus electrification.

For Elizabeth Adams, Transportation Alternatives deputy executive director for public affairs: “Congestion pricing is a win for everyone — regardless of if you walk, bike, take transit, or even drive into the Central Business District.”

She paints a primarily green picture of the future. “With the go-ahead from the federal government, it's time for New York State to implement congestion pricing without delay and take steps today to permanently reclaim that space from cars. Without so much congestion of our street space, we can build streets that truly serve the people of New York City — with more green space, better transit, and cleaner air."

Congestion pricing

Riders Alliance executive director Betsy Plum sees this as the green light for subway signal upgrades, new rolling stock and station improvements such as elevators. “Congestion pricing will also cut the gridlock that wastes an estimated $20 billion annually that families absorb in more expensive goods and services and that slows our buses down to a crawl,” she adds.

And the fact that there have been bumps along the way is not lost on Plum, who concludes: “After years of delays, which transit riders are all too familiar with, the federal government has at last decided that millions of New Yorkers, commuters, and visitors to our city can have nice things after all.”

Related Content

  • An innovation lab – not a burden
    June 27, 2018
    Travellers want to be able to book multimodal journeys easily – and to be informed of problems and alternatives as they go. Adam Roark might just be able to help, finds Ben Spencer. The global shift in transportation towards members of the public wanting access to multimodal journeys is rapidly changing how people pay and plan ahead. Buying tickets from a machine and dealing with the frustration of discovering your train is cancelled is a scenario commuters want to avoid through technology’s ability to
  • Xerox takes youthful view of future transport
    August 23, 2016
    Xerox’s David Cummins talks to Colin Sowman about the lessons for city authorities from its survey of younger peoples’ attitude to transport. There can be no better way to get a handle on the future of transport demand than to ask the younger generation about how they view and consume today’s transport. Sociologists have called this group Generation Z – those born between 1995 and 2007 – which will make up 40% of all US consumers by 2020.
  • Sprawl spreads the costs and confines the benefits
    June 8, 2015
    A new report says car-centric planning leads to inefficient cities and divided communities as lead author Todd Litman explains. Between 1950 and 2050 the human population will have approximately quadrupled and shifted from 80% rural to nearly 80% urban; by the middle of this century the United Nations predicts an additional 2.2 billion urban residents in developing countries than there are today. How these cities grow has huge economic, social and environmental impacts and implementing proper policies can c
  • Sprawl spreads the costs and confines the benefits
    June 8, 2015
    A new report says car-centric planning leads to inefficient cities and divided communities as lead author Todd Litman explains. Between 1950 and 2050 the human population will have approximately quadrupled and shifted from 80% rural to nearly 80% urban; by the middle of this century the United Nations predicts an additional 2.2 billion urban residents in developing countries than there are today. How these cities grow has huge economic, social and environmental impacts and implementing proper policies can c