Skip to main content

The Canadian way

Delcan has developed an ITS project evaluation methodology for Transport Canada. Victor Bruzon explains how it will assist in selecting and managing programmes. ITS projects offer a cost-effective solution for many transportation problems. Individual projects are often not evaluated and such evaluations can be restricted by limited data, the ability of ITS to affect only a portion of the transport network, and by evaluation methodologies that were developed with more traditional transport investments in min
July 16, 2012 Read time: 3 mins
RSS

Delcan has developed an ITS project evaluation methodology for Transport Canada. Victor Bruzon explains how it will assist in selecting and managing programmes.

ITS projects offer a cost-effective solution for many transportation problems. Individual projects are often not evaluated and such evaluations can be restricted by limited data, the ability of ITS to affect only a portion of the transport network, and by evaluation methodologies that were developed with more traditional transport investments in mind.

Evaluations that have been done often show a strong, positive rate of return. The evaluation methodology developed by 285 Delcan Corporation for 599 Transport Canada provides a framework to ensure consistency and validity of results across regions and across types of ITS investments and will help Canadian local and provincial agencies select and manage ITS programmes. In addition, the framework can help select projects that will improve the efficiency, safety and sustainability of the Canadian transportation system. This framework builds on existing work in Canada, the US and Europe.

Measure the benefits

Transport Canada's funding programme for ITS projects - Strategic Highway Infrastructure Program (SHIP) - began in March 2000 and was recently concluded. Over 100 ITS projects were funded under various arrangements representing a total investment of over $50 million. As considerations are made for renewed funding, there is an increasing need to measure the benefits derived from these projects and their success in meeting stated objectives. The methodology developed will serve as an ITS evaluation framework for past and future Canadian ITS projects.

The methodology is based on four evaluation steps: evaluation planning; data collection; data analysis; and recommendations and reporting. The report prepared for Transport Canada includes details of each step, including a discussion of the challenges that are typically encountered.

Two projects financed by Transport Canada under the SHIP programme have been selected to serve as sample cases and test the proposed evaluation framework. One of those examples, an ITS project in the Commercial Vehicle Operations (CVO) area in the Province of New Brunswick, Canada, (featured opposite) illustrates the cost/benefit results. The evaluation methodology framework report shows how the four evaluation steps were followed and contains a discussion of results, limitations and assumptions of the analysis.

Next steps

The evaluation framework recommends the following next steps: using the framework to complete more evaluations; collecting feedback regarding the evaluation framework and how it performs in practice; summarising the results from the evaluations to help provide access to others; integrating the Canadian evaluation material into one of the existing databases in the UK or the US; generating a 'lessons learned' report to provide guidance regarding which projects perform well and to identify implications for future programmes; and mandating that individual evaluations and the 'lessons learned' report both address the synergistic impacts of interactions among groups of ITS investments and between ITS and the underlying transportation infrastructure.

The report entitled 'Development of a Project Evaluation Methodology Framework for Transport Canada' was prepared by Dr Richard Mudge, Vice President, and Victor H. Bruzon, Vice President, Delcan Corporation.
RSS

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Connecticut Transit uses web feedback to improve user experience
    May 27, 2014
    Connecticut champions open government and open data to help fostertransparency, accountability and citizen engagement – and that includes transportation matters as Andrew Bardin Williams discovers. The last thing anyone wanted was to inconvenience or displace others - least of all people who lived and worked in the neighbourhood. Yet, workers in an office building in downtown New Haven, Conn., were tired of shuffling through hoards of people who kept sitting on the stoop to the building while waiting for th
  • Viaduct deck renewal creates detour dilemma for MassDOT
    May 26, 2016
    As the deck renewal of the I-91 viaduct in Springfield gets underway, David Crawford looks at the preparation and planning to ease the resulting traffic congestion. Accommodating the deck renewal of a 4km-long/four-lanes in each direction viaduct in the heart of Springfield (Massachusetts’ third largest city), has involved the state’s Department of Transportation (MassDOT) in a massive exercise in transport research and ITS-based area-wide preplanning and traffic management. Supporting a workzone of well ab
  • International tolling organisations sign joint declaration
    May 29, 2013
    The European Association of Operators of Toll Road Infrastructures (ASECAP) and the International Bridge, Tunnel and Turnpike Association (IBTTA), the worldwide association for the owners and operators of toll facilities and the businesses that serve them have signed an international joint tolling declaration designed to support a wider application of tolling policies throughout Europe and North America. The joint declaration calls for an increase in advocacy and application of tolling policies to support i
  • Amsterdam Group turn ITS theory into practice
    August 6, 2013
    ASECAP’s Marko Jandrisits discusses the Amsterdam Group’s efforts to bring a sense of order to cooperative ITS deployments. When an issue arises which is deemed to require a technological solution governments and public-sector agencies around the world all too often tread the same sorry path. A decision is made to research and develop said technology to the production-ready stage, the work is done and the technology realised but then the money for deployment runs out and the technology is left on the shelf