Skip to main content

The Canadian way

Delcan has developed an ITS project evaluation methodology for Transport Canada. Victor Bruzon explains how it will assist in selecting and managing programmes. ITS projects offer a cost-effective solution for many transportation problems. Individual projects are often not evaluated and such evaluations can be restricted by limited data, the ability of ITS to affect only a portion of the transport network, and by evaluation methodologies that were developed with more traditional transport investments in min
July 16, 2012 Read time: 3 mins
RSS

Delcan has developed an ITS project evaluation methodology for Transport Canada. Victor Bruzon explains how it will assist in selecting and managing programmes.

ITS projects offer a cost-effective solution for many transportation problems. Individual projects are often not evaluated and such evaluations can be restricted by limited data, the ability of ITS to affect only a portion of the transport network, and by evaluation methodologies that were developed with more traditional transport investments in mind.

Evaluations that have been done often show a strong, positive rate of return. The evaluation methodology developed by 285 Delcan Corporation for 599 Transport Canada provides a framework to ensure consistency and validity of results across regions and across types of ITS investments and will help Canadian local and provincial agencies select and manage ITS programmes. In addition, the framework can help select projects that will improve the efficiency, safety and sustainability of the Canadian transportation system. This framework builds on existing work in Canada, the US and Europe.

Measure the benefits

Transport Canada's funding programme for ITS projects - Strategic Highway Infrastructure Program (SHIP) - began in March 2000 and was recently concluded. Over 100 ITS projects were funded under various arrangements representing a total investment of over $50 million. As considerations are made for renewed funding, there is an increasing need to measure the benefits derived from these projects and their success in meeting stated objectives. The methodology developed will serve as an ITS evaluation framework for past and future Canadian ITS projects.

The methodology is based on four evaluation steps: evaluation planning; data collection; data analysis; and recommendations and reporting. The report prepared for Transport Canada includes details of each step, including a discussion of the challenges that are typically encountered.

Two projects financed by Transport Canada under the SHIP programme have been selected to serve as sample cases and test the proposed evaluation framework. One of those examples, an ITS project in the Commercial Vehicle Operations (CVO) area in the Province of New Brunswick, Canada, (featured opposite) illustrates the cost/benefit results. The evaluation methodology framework report shows how the four evaluation steps were followed and contains a discussion of results, limitations and assumptions of the analysis.

Next steps

The evaluation framework recommends the following next steps: using the framework to complete more evaluations; collecting feedback regarding the evaluation framework and how it performs in practice; summarising the results from the evaluations to help provide access to others; integrating the Canadian evaluation material into one of the existing databases in the UK or the US; generating a 'lessons learned' report to provide guidance regarding which projects perform well and to identify implications for future programmes; and mandating that individual evaluations and the 'lessons learned' report both address the synergistic impacts of interactions among groups of ITS investments and between ITS and the underlying transportation infrastructure.

The report entitled 'Development of a Project Evaluation Methodology Framework for Transport Canada' was prepared by Dr Richard Mudge, Vice President, and Victor H. Bruzon, Vice President, Delcan Corporation.
RSS

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • EU research develops method for evaluating critical infrastructure
    January 10, 2013
    The European Commission’s SeRoN research project has drawn to a close, having developed a sophisticated method of identifying and quantifying threats to critical infrastructure. In December 2008 the European Commission published the directive 2008/114/EC on the identification, designation and assessment of the need to improve ‘European critical infrastructure’. In line with the objectives formulated in this directive, the SeRoN (Security of Road Transport Networks) research project was established in Novemb
  • Safer roads need safe systems approach, better infrastructure
    January 19, 2012
    Some developed countries are far from leading the way when it comes to making road infrastructure safe. In fact, says the Road Safety Foundation's Joanne Hill, they learn a lot from what is happening in emergent nations. A new report from the Road Safety Foundation, 'Saving Lives, Saving Money - the costs and benefits of achieving safe roads', makes some startling assertions about attitudes to road safety. Although concerned predominantly with the UK, there are some universal lessons to be learned, accordin
  • Slow moving US road user charging programme
    July 18, 2012
    Bern Grush recently attended the Mileage-Based User Fee Conference in Austin Texas where the fledgling American landscape for Road User Charging is beginning to take shape. When I was a kid I liked to poke sticks into the ants' nests in sidewalk cracks. Ants would scatter in every conceivable direction. They ran in circles, they ran over and through each other. They screamed without logic. I was fascinated.
  • Demand management schemes, is there a better way?
    January 31, 2012
    The European Commission is placing too much emphasis on the use of demand management, according to the FIA. Here, Wil Botman, Director-General of the FIA's European Bureau, explains why. Towards the end of last year, the European Bureau of the Fédération Internationale de l'Automobile (FIA) released a statement which criticised the European Commission's (EC's) approach to urban traffic congestion following the adoption of the Action Plan on Urban Mobility. In particular, the FIA voiced concerns over what it