Skip to main content

The Canadian way

Delcan has developed an ITS project evaluation methodology for Transport Canada. Victor Bruzon explains how it will assist in selecting and managing programmes. ITS projects offer a cost-effective solution for many transportation problems. Individual projects are often not evaluated and such evaluations can be restricted by limited data, the ability of ITS to affect only a portion of the transport network, and by evaluation methodologies that were developed with more traditional transport investments in min
July 16, 2012 Read time: 3 mins
RSS

Delcan has developed an ITS project evaluation methodology for Transport Canada. Victor Bruzon explains how it will assist in selecting and managing programmes.

ITS projects offer a cost-effective solution for many transportation problems. Individual projects are often not evaluated and such evaluations can be restricted by limited data, the ability of ITS to affect only a portion of the transport network, and by evaluation methodologies that were developed with more traditional transport investments in mind.

Evaluations that have been done often show a strong, positive rate of return. The evaluation methodology developed by 285 Delcan Corporation for 599 Transport Canada provides a framework to ensure consistency and validity of results across regions and across types of ITS investments and will help Canadian local and provincial agencies select and manage ITS programmes. In addition, the framework can help select projects that will improve the efficiency, safety and sustainability of the Canadian transportation system. This framework builds on existing work in Canada, the US and Europe.

Measure the benefits

Transport Canada's funding programme for ITS projects - Strategic Highway Infrastructure Program (SHIP) - began in March 2000 and was recently concluded. Over 100 ITS projects were funded under various arrangements representing a total investment of over $50 million. As considerations are made for renewed funding, there is an increasing need to measure the benefits derived from these projects and their success in meeting stated objectives. The methodology developed will serve as an ITS evaluation framework for past and future Canadian ITS projects.

The methodology is based on four evaluation steps: evaluation planning; data collection; data analysis; and recommendations and reporting. The report prepared for Transport Canada includes details of each step, including a discussion of the challenges that are typically encountered.

Two projects financed by Transport Canada under the SHIP programme have been selected to serve as sample cases and test the proposed evaluation framework. One of those examples, an ITS project in the Commercial Vehicle Operations (CVO) area in the Province of New Brunswick, Canada, (featured opposite) illustrates the cost/benefit results. The evaluation methodology framework report shows how the four evaluation steps were followed and contains a discussion of results, limitations and assumptions of the analysis.

Next steps

The evaluation framework recommends the following next steps: using the framework to complete more evaluations; collecting feedback regarding the evaluation framework and how it performs in practice; summarising the results from the evaluations to help provide access to others; integrating the Canadian evaluation material into one of the existing databases in the UK or the US; generating a 'lessons learned' report to provide guidance regarding which projects perform well and to identify implications for future programmes; and mandating that individual evaluations and the 'lessons learned' report both address the synergistic impacts of interactions among groups of ITS investments and between ITS and the underlying transportation infrastructure.

The report entitled 'Development of a Project Evaluation Methodology Framework for Transport Canada' was prepared by Dr Richard Mudge, Vice President, and Victor H. Bruzon, Vice President, Delcan Corporation.
RSS

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Connected Vehicles test vehicle to vehicle applications
    January 19, 2012
    In the US, the ITS Joint Program Office is about to conduct a series of Driver Clinics intended to gauge public reaction to Connected Vehicle safety technologies and applications. Starting in August, the US Department of Transportation (USDOT) will test Vehicle-to-Vehicle (V2V) applications with everyday drivers in what it describes as 'normal operational scenarios'. These Driver Clinics are being carried out at six locations across the US and together with the subsequent model deployment beginning in 2012,
  • Florida’s Altamonte Springs uses Uber pilot program with Uber to expand transportation coverage
    April 5, 2017
    To Uber or Not to Uber, that is the question cities must answer as they consider the pros and cons of inviting private transportation service providers to fill transportation gaps. Back in 1999, Frank Martz, city manager of Altamonte Springs, Florida, had an idea to expand transportation services to areas not covered by the local bus company.
  • Cost benefit: Toronto retimings tame traffic trauma
    July 19, 2018
    Canada’s largest city reckons that it is saving its taxpayers’ money simply by altering the way traffic lights work. David Crawford reviews Toronto’s ambitious plans to ease congestion Toronto, Canada’s largest metropolis (and the fourth largest in North America), has saved its residents CAN$53 (US$42.4) for every CAN$1 (US$0.80) spent over a 2012-2016 traffic signal retiming programme, according to figures released by its Transportation Services Division. The programme covered 1,275 signals (the city’s
  • Time for a rethink on road user charging
    February 1, 2012
    There is no value in further US VMT charging trials, except to delay the inevitable. These trials should end after completion of the University of Iowa's National Evaluation of a Mileage-based Road User Charge. There is far greater promise in unleashing private operators to commence profitable, non-tolling services, then using these for toll assessment and collection as fuel distributors are currently used to collect fuel taxation. Bern Grush writes