Skip to main content

Camera lowering poles aid maintenance, cut costs

It was while on vacation in Providence, Rhode Island that Jim Larsen had a Eureka! moment
January 20, 2012 Read time: 3 mins

It was while on vacation in Providence, Rhode Island that Jim Larsen had a Eureka! moment

In 2001, Jim Larsen was a traffic operations engineer with Ada County Highway District (795 ACHD) located in southern Idaho.

Established in 1972 as an independent government entity, it is responsible for all planning, construction, maintenance, operations, rehabilitation and improvements to Ada County's urban streets, rural roadways and bridges. Geographically, the district's jurisdiction includes the cities of Boise, Eagle, Garden City, Kuna, Meridian, Star and the unincorporated areas of Ada County; it is the only consolidated countywide
highway district in the State of Idaho.

Project:
Use of camera lowering technology

Benefits:

• 92% per cent saving per year in maintenance costs

• 65-80% less time per CCTV site cleaning and maintaining the cameras

• No freeway lane closures or traffic control are needed to maintain CCTV cameras

• Greater CCTV mounting heights

• Camera maintenance is now a one -man job

• Better choice of camera location
795 ACHD maintains and operates around 3,400km of roads and streets in Ada County, with an estimated value of US$3 billion.

This infrastructure includes facilities that range from multi-lane, arterial streets to narrow, farm-to-market roadways. It also maintains 400 traffic signals and has an extensive fibre/IP communications network of some 240km of installed fibre.

ACHD has the only TMC in the State of Idaho that operates 5:30am-6:30pm Monday to Friday which is jointly funded by ACHD and the Idaho Transportation Department.

District staff maintain over 550 IP/Ethernet devices, and with only two electronic technicians to maintain all ITS devices, they are always looking for ways to cut ITS maintenance costs and also improve efficiency.

Cut costs

And that's how Jim Larsen's Eureka! moment came about.

"While on vacation back in Providence, Rhode Island, in 2001, I was travelling down I-95 and saw the 25m (80ft) camera lowing poles on the freeway," Larsen explains. "I realised this may be a great way to cut costs associated with cleaning and maintaining our CCTV cameras."

After thoroughly investigating camera lowering poles and technology, in 2002 ACHD decided to begin changing existing 15.25m (50ft) fixed CCTV poles on I-84 and I-184 in the Boise region to the 93 MG Squared camera lowering poles. For new freeway installations both ACHD and the Idaho Transportation Department decided to make these lowering poles an agency standard.

"The benefits of this technology are significant in a whole range of areas," Larsen says. "In cost terms, ACHD is saving 92 per cent per year in maintenance costs with the 22 CCTV lowering poles we now have in place.

We have also achieved lower design costs for camera/pole installation projects because fewer cameras are needed with the greater CCTV mounting heights we now have, such as around 20m (70ft) at major freeway interchanges in Boise. Also, camera maintenance is now a one-man job whereas two were needed in the past with fixed camera poles." Although contributing significant cost savings, other benefits also greatly improve operational and maintenance factors. For instance, Larsen has calculated that 65-80 per cent less time per CCTV site is needed to clean and maintain cameras. consideration.

"We can now clean a camera on a lowering pole in 15 minutes per site, whereas fixed poles required 40-75 minutes per site, depending on traffic control." And that highlights another key benefit: no freeway lane closures or traffic control are needed to maintain CCTV cameras on lowering poles, which not only benefits drivers with less freeway delay, but is inherently safer for maintenance crews. Indeed, as Larsen points out, since no bucket trucks are needed to clean or maintain cameras, ACHD is not limited by their 15m height limitation. Devices can be installed at the most desirable operational height, and there is a much better choice of pole locations because bucket truck access is no longer aconsideration.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Move NY Legislation introduced
    March 29, 2016
    A coalition of New York State Assembly Members has unveiled legislation that they say will not only fund Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) capital needs but will create a US$4.5 billion Transit Gap Investment Fund (TGIF) to expand public transit and improve accessibility for millions of New Yorkers, particularly those who live in so-called ‘transit deserts’. Introduced by Assembly Member Robert J. Rodriguez, chair of the subcommittee on infrastructure, and joined by 14 co-sponsors from across t
  • Connected vehicle technology the solution to safety?
    January 25, 2012
    A series of 'driver clinics' is under way across five states, as vehicle manufacturers and the US Government pin their hopes on connected vehicles becoming the next big advance in road safety. Pete Goldin reports. What would a car say if it could talk? Its first words might be: "Here I am". Many vehicles are communicating that very message to each other right now. Admittedly, this is in controlled environments of US Department of Transportation (USDoT) tests, but within the next few years 'connected vehicle
  • Counting the environmental costs of ITS deployment
    October 29, 2015
    David Crawford looks at the latest thinking about calculating the benefits associated with the environmental side of ITS schemes. The penny is dropping that some environmental costs “are being shifted outside the traditional bounds of evaluation methods” for ITS-based road transport projects, according to researchers at the UK University of Leeds’ Institute for Transport Studies.
  • Smoothing out city freight movements
    May 28, 2014
    David Crawford welcomes a national first. Urban freight movements, while commercially and socially vital, are a growing logistical headache for planners and people alike. Figures from France’s Lyon Laboratory of Transport Economics indicate that goods transport in major urban areas accounts for: 20% of traffic; 35% of CO2 emissions made by all urban trips; and 50% of the diesel used; while final km delivery runs account for 20% of the total cost of the transport chain.